MU vs. TLT
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, MU returned 55.03%/yr vs -1.85%/yr for TLT. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
MU vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 232.74% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -1.08% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 55.03%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.85% annualized return.
MU
- 1D
- 9.87%
- 1M
- 27.11%
- YTD
- 232.74%
- 6M
- 284.77%
- 1Y
- 776.52%
- 3Y*
- 144.94%
- 5Y*
- 65.39%
- 10Y*
- 55.03%
TLT
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- -1.08%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- -2.05%
- 5Y*
- -6.70%
- 10Y*
- -1.85%
MU vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 232.74% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -1.08% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | -1.61% | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and TLT is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2002 | -0.19 |
The correlation between MU and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (all time) to 0.03 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
MU
TLT
MU vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MU | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +11.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | 1.07 | +0.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 25.90 | 0.49 | +25.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 100.37 | 1.19 | +99.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MU | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.44 | 0.38 | +11.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | -0.42 | +1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | -0.12 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.25 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
MU vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than TLT's maximum drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -48.35% | -49.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -7.58% | -22.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | -19.18% | -38.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | -43.70% | -13.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | -48.35% | -9.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.07% | -40.92% | +28.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.19% | -13.83% | -44.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.80% | 3.08% | +4.72% |
Volatility
MU vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 34.16% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.65%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.16% | 2.65% | +31.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.74% | 6.51% | +50.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.70% | 9.60% | +59.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.91% | 15.85% | +37.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.99% | 14.91% | +35.08% |
Dividends
MU vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than TLT's 4.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.63% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and TLT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (34.16%) compared to TLT (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs TLT's -48.35%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.44 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer