PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MU vs. SSLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MU vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MU is traded in USD, while SSLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 244.07% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's -5.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 55.83%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.24% annualized return.


MU

1D
-1.43%
1M
22.15%
YTD
244.07%
6M
307.41%
1Y
746.93%
3Y*
144.69%
5Y*
66.21%
10Y*
55.83%

SSLN.L

1D
5.12%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-5.64%
6M
9.43%
1Y
85.51%
3Y*
41.29%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*
14.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MU vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
244.07%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%
SSLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC
-5.64%147.64%21.15%-1.25%3.38%-12.63%45.36%17.20%-8.94%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MU and SSLN.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MU vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SSLN.L
SSLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MU vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUSSLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+9.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.29

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

24.91

1.95

+22.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

94.64

4.30

+90.34

MU vs. SSLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MU Sharpe Ratio is 10.83, which is higher than the SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MU and SSLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MU vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than SSLN.L's maximum drawdown of -83.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and SSLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUSSLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.25%

-83.11%

-15.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.28%

-43.71%

+13.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.63%

-43.71%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

-43.71%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

-43.71%

-13.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.07%

-40.83%

+31.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.16%

-65.48%

+7.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.95%

19.83%

-11.88%

Volatility

MU vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 32.86% compared to iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) at 15.39%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUSSLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.86%

15.39%

+17.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.74%

53.94%

+3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.66%

56.70%

+12.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.18%

38.19%

+14.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.12%

32.34%

+17.78%

Dividends

MU vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison

MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while SSLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%
SSLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MU and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MU and SSLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer