MU vs. QQQI
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, MU returned 758.76% vs 19.87% for QQQI. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MU vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 240.34% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 10.04% return.
MU
- 1D
- 12.17%
- 1M
- -14.38%
- 6M
- 166.13%
- YTD
- 240.34%
- 1Y
- 758.76%
- 3Y*
- 146.36%
- 5Y*
- 67.49%
- 10Y*
- 54.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.59%
QQQI
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 19.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.68%
MU vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 240.34% | 240.24% | -5.11% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 10.04% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and QQQI is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.64 |
The correlation between MU and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
MU
QQQI
MU vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MU | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.24 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 25.31 | 2.08 | +23.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 84.73 | 8.34 | +76.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MU vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -20.00% | -78.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -9.61% | -20.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.99% | -3.16% | -16.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.05% | -2.22% | -55.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.03% | 2.39% | +6.64% |
Volatility
MU vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 32.09% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 6.40%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.09% | 6.40% | +25.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.69% | 13.06% | +50.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.22% | 15.68% | +61.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.26% | 17.62% | +37.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.92% | 17.62% | +33.30% |
Dividends
MU vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than QQQI's 13.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.81% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and QQQI have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (32.09%) compared to QQQI (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.93 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer