MU vs. NUKZ
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Over the past year, MU returned 776.52% vs 31.62% for NUKZ. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MU vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 232.74% return, which is significantly higher than NUKZ's 7.72% return.
MU
- 1D
- 9.87%
- 1M
- 27.11%
- YTD
- 232.74%
- 6M
- 284.77%
- 1Y
- 776.52%
- 3Y*
- 144.94%
- 5Y*
- 65.39%
- 10Y*
- 55.03%
NUKZ
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 31.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MU vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 232.74% | 240.24% | -4.04% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 7.72% | 56.57% | 62.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and NUKZ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank
MU
NUKZ
MU vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MU | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +10.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | 1.19 | +0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 25.90 | 1.92 | +23.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 100.37 | 4.79 | +95.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MU | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.44 | 1.05 | +10.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.63 | -1.33 |
Drawdowns
MU vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and NUKZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -33.03% | -65.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -16.51% | -13.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.07% | -10.27% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.19% | -6.02% | -52.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.80% | 6.62% | +1.18% |
Volatility
MU vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 34.16% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 10.20%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.16% | 10.20% | +23.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.74% | 22.61% | +34.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.70% | 30.26% | +38.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.91% | 32.82% | +20.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.99% | 32.82% | +17.17% |
Dividends
MU vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than NUKZ's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (34.16%) compared to NUKZ (10.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.44 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and NUKZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer