MU vs. MLPX
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) is Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Over the past 10 years, MU returned 52.31%/yr vs 12.10%/yr for MLPX. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MU vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 215.59% return, which is significantly higher than MLPX's 26.26% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed MLPX with an annualized return of 52.31%, while MLPX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.10% annualized return.
MU
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- -20.49%
- 6M
- 131.49%
- YTD
- 215.59%
- 1Y
- 710.39%
- 3Y*
- 133.83%
- 5Y*
- 64.97%
- 10Y*
- 52.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.35%
MLPX
- 1D
- -3.05%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 20.26%
- YTD
- 26.26%
- 1Y
- 29.43%
- 3Y*
- 26.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.55M | $35.33M | $30.39M | |
| $40.41B | $43.36B | $47.59B |
MU vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 215.59% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 26.26% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | 21.54% | 39.63% | -20.32% | 19.04% | -15.64% | -4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and MLPX is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2013 | 0.30 |
The correlation between MU and MLPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
MU
MLPX
MU vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MU | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.32 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.69 | 3.62 | +20.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 75.67 | 8.52 | +67.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MU vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than MLPX's maximum drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and MLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -70.67% | -27.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -8.18% | -22.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | -16.77% | -40.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | -19.72% | -37.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | -64.70% | +7.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.81% | -3.65% | -22.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.03% | -16.49% | -41.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.46% | 3.46% | +6.00% |
Volatility
MU vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 24.29% compared to Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) at 5.85%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.29% | 5.85% | +18.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.07% | 12.60% | +51.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.74% | 15.78% | +61.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.36% | 19.92% | +35.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.91% | 26.17% | +24.74% |
Dividends
MU vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than MLPX's 4.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.06% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and MLPX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (24.29%) compared to MLPX (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs MLPX's -70.67%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.24 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and MLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer