MU vs. MLPX

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Over the past 10 years, MU returned 54.25%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for MLPX. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MU vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 228.97% return, which is significantly higher than MLPX's 26.86% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed MLPX with an annualized return of 54.25%, while MLPX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.38% annualized return.

MU

• 1D: -4.71%
• 1M: 8.62%
• 6M: 173.39%
• YTD: 228.97%
• 1Y: 683.76%
• 3Y*: 150.11%
• 5Y*: 65.67%
• 10Y*: 54.25%

MLPX

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: 2.16%
• 6M: 29.37%
• YTD: 26.86%
• 1Y: 28.71%
• 3Y*: 28.19%
• 5Y*: 22.12%
• 10Y*: 12.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MU vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	228.97%	240.24%	-0.96%	71.93%	-45.93%	24.21%	39.79%	69.49%	-22.84%	87.59%
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	26.86%	4.96%	42.90%	15.77%	21.54%	39.63%	-20.32%	19.04%	-15.64%	-4.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MU and MLPX is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2013	0.30

The correlation between MU and MLPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MU vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

MLPX

MLPX Risk / Return Rank: 67
MLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
MLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
MLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
MLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
MLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MU vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MU	MLPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	9.12	1.84	+7.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.37	2.59	+2.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.31	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	22.80	3.53	+19.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	84.52	8.37	+76.16

MU vs. MLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MU Sharpe Ratio is 9.12, which is higher than the MLPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MU and MLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MU vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than MLPX's maximum drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and MLPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MU	MLPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.25%	-70.67%	-27.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.28%	-8.18%	-22.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.63%	-16.77%	-40.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.63%	-19.72%	-37.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.63%	-64.70%	+7.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.66%	-3.18%	-19.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.08%	-16.55%	-41.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.15%	3.44%	+4.71%

Volatility

MU vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 37.60% compared to Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) at 5.83%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MU	MLPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.60%	5.83%	+31.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.73%	12.52%	+50.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.72%	15.68%	+60.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.74%	20.04%	+34.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.65%	26.29%	+24.36%

Dividends

MU vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison

MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than MLPX's 4.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.04%	4.88%	4.30%	5.22%	5.23%	5.98%	8.32%	5.78%	5.77%	4.36%	5.50%	4.81%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.06%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MU and MLPX in my portfolio?

MU and MLPX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MU or MLPX?

MU has higher volatility (37.60%) compared to MLPX (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs MLPX's -70.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.12 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.