MU vs. LQDA
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) and LQDA (Liquidia Corporation) are both stocks. MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while LQDA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, MU returned 65.39%/yr vs 87.74%/yr for LQDA. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MU vs. LQDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 232.74% return, which is significantly higher than LQDA's 85.27% return.
MU
- 1D
- 9.87%
- 1M
- 27.11%
- YTD
- 232.74%
- 6M
- 284.77%
- 1Y
- 776.52%
- 3Y*
- 144.94%
- 5Y*
- 65.39%
- 10Y*
- 55.03%
LQDA
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- 51.06%
- YTD
- 85.27%
- 6M
- 82.52%
- 1Y
- 252.26%
- 3Y*
- 96.59%
- 5Y*
- 87.74%
- 10Y*
- —
MU vs. LQDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 232.74% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -40.98% |
LQDA Liquidia Corporation | 85.27% | 193.28% | -2.24% | 88.85% | 30.80% | 65.08% | -30.99% | -80.26% | 95.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and LQDA is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018 | 0.18 |
The correlation between MU and LQDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MU:
$1.08T
LQDA:
$6.46B
MU:
$21.26
LQDA:
$0.24
MU:
44.66
LQDA:
267.21
MU:
18.53
LQDA:
20.69
MU:
14.94
LQDA:
59.51
MU:
$58.12B
LQDA:
$288.07M
MU:
$33.96B
LQDA:
$275.77M
MU:
$25.99B
LQDA:
$51.53M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. LQDA — Risk / Return Rank
MU
LQDA
MU vs. LQDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Liquidia Corporation (LQDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MU | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | 1.46 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 25.90 | 7.12 | +18.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 100.37 | 15.88 | +84.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MU | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.44 | 3.74 | +7.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | 1.20 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.29 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
MU vs. LQDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, roughly equal to the maximum LQDA drawdown of -93.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and LQDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -93.87% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -35.66% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | -46.80% | -10.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | -55.36% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.07% | 0.00% | -12.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.19% | -69.65% | +11.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.80% | 16.05% | -8.25% |
Volatility
MU vs. LQDA - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 34.16% compared to Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) at 28.47%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.16% | 28.47% | +5.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.74% | 47.97% | +8.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.70% | 68.06% | +0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.91% | 73.62% | -20.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.99% | 85.75% | -35.76% |
Dividends
MU vs. LQDA - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while LQDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDA Liquidia Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Financials
MU vs. LQDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Micron Technology, Inc. and Liquidia Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MU vs. LQDA - Profitability Comparison
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.
LQDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a gross profit of 132.09M and revenue of 132.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.4%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.
LQDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported an operating income of 61.50M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.
LQDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a net income of 52.86M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and LQDA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (34.16%) compared to LQDA (28.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs LQDA's -93.87%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.44 vs 3.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and LQDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer