MTYY vs. TDVI
MTYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF) and TDVI (FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MTYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TDVI.
Performance
MTYY vs. TDVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTYY achieves a -33.22% return, which is significantly lower than TDVI's 18.66% return.
MTYY
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -26.74%
- YTD
- -33.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TDVI
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 18.61%
- YTD
- 18.66%
- 1Y
- 28.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.94K | $41.87K | $72.93K | |
| $5.64M | $4.51M | $3.75M |
MTYY vs. TDVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF | -33.22% | -55.60% |
TDVI FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF | 18.66% | -2.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTYY and TDVI is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTYY vs. TDVI — Risk / Return Rank
MTYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TDVI
MTYY vs. TDVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF (MTYY) and FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF (TDVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTYY | TDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.91 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTYY vs. TDVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTYY drawdown since its inception was -70.83%, which is greater than TDVI's maximum drawdown of -22.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTYY and TDVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTYY | TDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.83% | -22.08% | -48.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.35% | -10.45% | -59.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.74% | -3.48% | -50.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.76% | — |
Volatility
MTYY vs. TDVI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTYY | TDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.18% | 20.13% | +12.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.18% | 20.09% | +12.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.18% | 20.09% | +12.09% |
MTYY vs. TDVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TDVI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTYY vs. TDVI - Dividend Comparison
MTYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 241.28%, more than TDVI's 7.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF | 241.28% | 48.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDVI FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF | 7.31% | 7.53% | 7.90% | 3.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTYY and TDVI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDVI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDVI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MTYY.
MTYY has the higher dividend yield at 241.28%, compared with 7.31% for TDVI.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MTYY and 0.75% for TDVI.
Find the right allocation for MTYY and TDVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer