MTUM vs. VLUE
MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and VLUE (iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while VLUE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MTUM returned 18.03%/yr vs 15.97%/yr for VLUE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
MTUM vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 38.19% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 50.50% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed VLUE with an annualized return of 18.03%, while VLUE has yielded a comparatively lower 15.97% annualized return.
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 13.83%
- YTD
- 38.19%
- 6M
- 36.52%
- 1Y
- 50.96%
- 3Y*
- 35.93%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- 18.03%
VLUE
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- 50.50%
- 6M
- 49.56%
- 1Y
- 89.78%
- 3Y*
- 34.06%
- 5Y*
- 17.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.97%
MTUM vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 38.19% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 50.50% | 32.67% | 7.25% | 14.26% | -14.17% | 28.93% | -0.23% | 27.20% | -11.13% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTUM and VLUE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.68 |
The correlation between MTUM and VLUE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
MTUM vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MTUM
VLUE
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
MTUM
VLUE
Industrials
MTUM
VLUE
Energy
MTUM
VLUE
Communication Services
MTUM
VLUE
Financial Services
MTUM
VLUE
Consumer Defensive
MTUM
VLUE
Healthcare
MTUM
VLUE
Consumer Cyclical
MTUM
VLUE
Basic Materials
MTUM
VLUE
Real Estate
MTUM
VLUE
Utilities
MTUM
VLUE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTUM vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank
MTUM
VLUE
MTUM vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTUM | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.81 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.44 | 9.99 | -5.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.05 | 41.99 | -24.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTUM vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum VLUE drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and VLUE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTUM | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.08% | -39.47% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -9.04% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.99% | -17.89% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.28% | -27.12% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.08% | -39.47% | +5.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -6.00% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.15% | +0.85% |
Volatility
MTUM vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 11.02% compared to iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) at 8.92%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTUM | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.02% | 8.92% | +2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.88% | 15.67% | +3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.48% | 18.74% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 18.05% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.28% | 19.96% | +1.32% |
MTUM vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MTUM and VLUE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MTUM vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison
MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than VLUE's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.54% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 1.37% | 2.11% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTUM and VLUE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (11.02%) compared to VLUE (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs VLUE's -39.47%.
On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 18.03% vs 15.97% for VLUE. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, VLUE has been the lower-risk option at 8.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 18.03% return vs 15.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM and VLUE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
VLUE has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.54% for MTUM.
MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while VLUE is Large Cap Value Equities. MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while VLUE tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index.
VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTUM and VLUE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer