MTUM vs. USMV
MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while USMV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MTUM returned 17.15%/yr vs 9.90%/yr for USMV. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
MTUM vs. USMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 29.72% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 2.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed USMV with an annualized return of 17.15%, while USMV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.90% annualized return.
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 29.72%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 40.78%
- 3Y*
- 33.16%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- 17.15%
USMV
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 11.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.24%
- 10Y*
- 9.90%
MTUM vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 29.72% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.43% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 5.64% | 27.69% | 1.33% | 18.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTUM and USMV is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MTUM and USMV has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MTUM vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MTUM
USMV
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
MTUM
USMV
Industrials
MTUM
USMV
Financial Services
MTUM
USMV
Communication Services
MTUM
USMV
Healthcare
MTUM
USMV
Consumer Cyclical
MTUM
USMV
Energy
MTUM
USMV
Consumer Defensive
MTUM
USMV
Real Estate
MTUM
USMV
Basic Materials
MTUM
USMV
Utilities
MTUM
USMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTUM vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank
MTUM
USMV
MTUM vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTUM | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.08 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 0.62 | +2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.66 | 2.06 | +11.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTUM vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, roughly equal to the maximum USMV drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and USMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTUM | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.08% | -33.10% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -6.46% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.99% | -9.36% | -11.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.28% | -17.93% | -14.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.08% | -33.10% | -0.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -1.40% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -2.87% | -3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 1.95% | +1.04% |
Volatility
MTUM vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 10.89% compared to iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) at 2.70%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTUM | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.89% | 2.70% | +8.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.63% | 6.02% | +12.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.87% | 8.56% | +12.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 12.36% | +8.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 14.51% | +6.69% |
MTUM vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MTUM and USMV have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MTUM vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison
MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than USMV's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.61% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.53% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTUM and USMV have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to USMV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs USMV's -33.10%.
On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.15% vs 9.90% for USMV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.15% return vs 9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM and USMV have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.61% for MTUM.
MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while USMV is Large Cap Blend Equities. MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index.
MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTUM and USMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer