PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTUM vs. USMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTUM vs. USMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 29.72% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 2.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed USMV with an annualized return of 17.15%, while USMV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.90% annualized return.


MTUM

1D
1.69%
1M
6.22%
YTD
29.72%
6M
30.51%
1Y
40.78%
3Y*
33.16%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
17.15%

USMV

1D
0.43%
1M
1.84%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.34%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTUM vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
29.72%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
2.43%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUM and USMV is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between MTUM and USMV has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MTUM vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MTUM
USMV

Technology

44.4%
30.8%

Industrials

15.6%
5.7%

Financial Services

10.4%
12.4%

Communication Services

7.4%
5.9%

Healthcare

6.9%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%
5.7%

Energy

3.5%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
10.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.2%

Utilities

1.6%
7.5%

Technology

MTUM
44.4%
USMV
30.8%

Industrials

MTUM
15.6%
USMV
5.7%

Financial Services

MTUM
10.4%
USMV
12.4%

Communication Services

MTUM
7.4%
USMV
5.9%

Healthcare

MTUM
6.9%
USMV
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

MTUM
3.6%
USMV
5.7%

Energy

MTUM
3.5%
USMV
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

MTUM
3.3%
USMV
10.0%

Real Estate

MTUM
1.8%
USMV
2.2%

Basic Materials

MTUM
1.7%
USMV
2.2%

Utilities

MTUM
1.6%
USMV
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTUM vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUM vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTUMUSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.08

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

0.62

+2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

2.06

+11.60

MTUM vs. USMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the USMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUM and USMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTUM vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, roughly equal to the maximum USMV drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and USMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTUMUSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-33.10%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-6.46%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

-9.36%

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

-17.93%

-14.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

-33.10%

-0.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-1.40%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.20%

-2.87%

-3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

1.95%

+1.04%

Volatility

MTUM vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 10.89% compared to iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) at 2.70%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTUMUSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.89%

2.70%

+8.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.63%

6.02%

+12.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.87%

8.56%

+12.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

12.36%

+8.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

14.51%

+6.69%

MTUM vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MTUM and USMV have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MTUM vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison

MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than USMV's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.61%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.53%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTUM and USMV have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to USMV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs USMV's -33.10%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.15% vs 9.90% for USMV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.15% return vs 9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM and USMV have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.61% for MTUM.

MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while USMV is Large Cap Blend Equities. MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTUM and USMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer