MTUM vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MTUM returned 15.90%/yr vs 17.66%/yr for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

MTUM vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 33.55% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 21.25% return.

MTUM

• 1D: 2.96%
• 1M: 11.98%
• YTD: 33.55%
• 6M: 34.98%
• 1Y: 46.22%
• 3Y*: 33.86%
• 5Y*: 15.90%
• 10Y*: 17.54%

QQQM

• 1D: 3.11%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: 21.25%
• 6M: 22.16%
• 1Y: 41.92%
• 3Y*: 27.28%
• 5Y*: 17.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTUM vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	33.55%	22.15%	32.89%	9.15%	-18.27%	13.36%	4.49%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	21.25%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUM and QQQM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.83

The correlation between MTUM and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

MTUM vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MTUM	QQQM
Technology	50.2%	58.7%
Industrials	15.0%	2.6%
Energy	10.5%	0.5%
Communication Services	5.1%	14.3%
Financial Services	5.0%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	6.4%
Healthcare	3.5%	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	11.4%
Basic Materials	2.3%	1.0%
Real Estate	1.3%	0.1%
Utilities	0.6%	1.2%

Return for Risk

MTUM vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUM

MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 79
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 84

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 80
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUM vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MTUM	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.43	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	3.13	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.43	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	3.52	+0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.48	13.11	+2.37

MTUM vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUM Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUM and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MTUM vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTUM	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.08%	-35.04%	+0.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.54%	-11.96%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.99%	-22.70%	+1.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.28%	-35.04%	+2.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.32%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.20%	-8.22%	+2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	3.20%	-0.21%

Volatility

MTUM vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 11.20% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 8.01%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTUM	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.20%	8.01%	+3.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.83%	14.01%	+4.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.08%	17.35%	+3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.99%	22.45%	-1.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.23%	22.25%	-1.02%

MTUM vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MTUM and QQQM have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MTUM vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	0.70%	0.91%	0.75%	1.35%	1.80%	0.55%	0.83%	1.48%	1.27%	1.02%	1.43%	1.12%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.41%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTUM and QQQM in my portfolio?

MTUM and QQQM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MTUM or QQQM?

MTUM has higher volatility (11.20%) compared to QQQM (8.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which ETF is better, MTUM or QQQM?

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 17.66% vs 15.90% for MTUM. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 8.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MTUM or QQQM?

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 17.66% return vs 15.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTUM or QQQM?

MTUM and QQQM have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTUM or QQQM?

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.

What is the main difference between MTUM and QQQM?

MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.