MTUM vs. ONEO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and ONEO (SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF) are both Momentum funds - MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index while ONEO tracks the Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MTUM returned 17.44%/yr vs 12.20%/yr for ONEO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MTUM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ONEO.

Performance

MTUM vs. ONEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 31.46% return, which is significantly higher than ONEO's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed ONEO with an annualized return of 17.44%, while ONEO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.20% annualized return.

MTUM

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 8.29%
• YTD: 31.46%
• 6M: 28.81%
• 1Y: 39.62%
• 3Y*: 33.68%
• 5Y*: 15.03%
• 10Y*: 17.44%

ONEO

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: 17.68%
• 6M: 15.75%
• 1Y: 25.56%
• 3Y*: 18.68%
• 5Y*: 10.49%
• 10Y*: 12.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTUM vs. ONEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	31.46%	22.15%	32.89%	9.15%	-18.27%	13.36%	29.86%	27.25%	-1.67%	37.50%
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF	17.68%	10.61%	15.01%	15.64%	-12.01%	26.72%	10.76%	26.53%	-12.41%	21.16%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUM and ONEO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015	0.75

The correlation between MTUM and ONEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

MTUM vs. ONEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MTUM	ONEO
Technology	50.2%	25.6%
Industrials	15.0%	17.1%
Energy	10.5%	6.5%
Communication Services	5.1%	3.5%
Financial Services	5.0%	8.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	5.0%
Healthcare	3.5%	9.4%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	11.3%
Basic Materials	2.3%	4.7%
Real Estate	1.3%	2.8%
Utilities	0.6%	5.4%

Return for Risk

MTUM vs. ONEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUM

MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 66
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

ONEO

ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 71
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 63
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUM vs. ONEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MTUM	ONEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	1.92	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.75	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.34	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	3.48	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.13	13.64	-0.52

MTUM vs. ONEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the ONEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUM and ONEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MTUM vs. ONEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum ONEO drawdown of -40.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and ONEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTUM	ONEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.08%	-40.86%	+6.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.54%	-7.37%	-4.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.99%	-19.72%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.28%	-22.39%	-9.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.08%	-40.86%	+6.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.87%	-1.12%	-3.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.19%	-4.97%	-1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	1.88%	+1.15%

Volatility

MTUM vs. ONEO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 12.23% compared to SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) at 4.87%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTUM	ONEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.23%	4.87%	+7.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.36%	10.44%	+8.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.89%	13.36%	+8.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.15%	17.29%	+3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.31%	18.69%	+2.62%

MTUM vs. ONEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ONEO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MTUM vs. ONEO - Dividend Comparison

MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than ONEO's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	0.56%	0.91%	0.75%	1.35%	1.80%	0.55%	0.83%	1.48%	1.27%	1.02%	1.43%	1.12%
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF	1.19%	1.29%	1.30%	1.56%	1.73%	1.19%	1.28%	1.64%	1.72%	7.69%	1.82%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTUM and ONEO in my portfolio?

MTUM and ONEO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MTUM or ONEO?

MTUM has higher volatility (12.23%) compared to ONEO (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs ONEO's -40.86%.

Which ETF is better, MTUM or ONEO?

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.44% vs 12.20% for ONEO. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ONEO has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MTUM or ONEO?

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.44% return vs 12.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTUM or ONEO?

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ONEO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTUM or ONEO?

ONEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.56% for MTUM.

What is the main difference between MTUM and ONEO?

MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.20% for ONEO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.