PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTUL vs. MVRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTUL vs. MVRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUL achieves a 61.40% return, which is significantly higher than MVRL's -3.14% return.


MTUL

1D
0.74%
1M
23.35%
YTD
61.40%
6M
63.02%
1Y
78.14%
3Y*
60.02%
5Y*
20.13%
10Y*

MVRL

1D
2.18%
1M
-6.30%
YTD
-3.14%
6M
-2.46%
1Y
14.65%
3Y*
8.41%
5Y*
-8.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTUL vs. MVRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MTUL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN
61.40%27.42%58.70%10.66%-37.97%7.00%
MVRL
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN
-3.14%14.96%-3.45%12.30%-42.41%14.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUL and MVRL is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2021

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between MTUL and MVRL has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTUL vs. MVRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUL
MTUL Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MTUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUL Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MVRL
MVRL Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MVRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVRL Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MVRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVRL Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUL vs. MVRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTULMVRLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.11

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

0.70

+2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.17

1.94

+11.23

MTUL vs. MVRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the MVRL Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUL and MVRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTULMVRLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

0.54

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

-0.23

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.13

+0.28

Drawdowns

MTUL vs. MVRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUL drawdown since its inception was -56.83%, smaller than the maximum MVRL drawdown of -60.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUL and MVRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTULMVRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.83%

-60.25%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.86%

-20.93%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.15%

-32.20%

-6.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.83%

-60.25%

+3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-38.62%

+38.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.66%

-31.81%

+9.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.95%

7.56%

-1.61%

Volatility

MTUL vs. MVRL - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) has a higher volatility of 20.00% compared to ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) at 6.35%. This indicates that MTUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTULMVRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.00%

6.35%

+13.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.62%

20.28%

+17.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.98%

27.25%

+16.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.80%

36.56%

+6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.63%

37.63%

+6.00%

MTUL vs. MVRL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MTUL and MVRL have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

MTUL vs. MVRL - Dividend Comparison

MTUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MVRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.76%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MTUL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MVRL
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN
20.76%19.15%19.27%18.69%25.21%12.33%5.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTUL and MVRL have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUL has higher volatility (20.00%) compared to MVRL (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUL dropped -56.83% vs MVRL's -60.25%.

On 5-year performance, MTUL leads with 20.13% vs -8.32% for MVRL. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, MVRL has been the lower-risk option at 6.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MTUL has performed better with a 20.13% return vs -8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUL and MVRL have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

MVRL has the higher dividend yield at 20.76%, compared with 0.00% for MTUL.

MTUL is categorized as Momentum, while MVRL is REIT. MTUL tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while MVRL tracks MVIS US Mortgage REITs Index (150%).

MTUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTUL and MVRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer