PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTSI vs. SEI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MTSI vs. SEI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) and Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTSI achieves a 46.80% return, which is significantly higher than SEI's 12.30% return.


MTSI

1D
1.10%
1M
-28.29%
6M
14.78%
YTD
46.80%
1Y
83.35%
3Y*
53.53%
5Y*
32.43%
10Y*
20.81%
ALL TIME*
19.64%

SEI

1D
0.25%
1M
-29.98%
6M
-6.46%
YTD
12.30%
1Y
58.96%
3Y*
73.99%
5Y*
47.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$366.45M$440.96M$588.74M
$200.05M$228.81M$190.63M

MTSI vs. SEI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
46.80%31.85%39.76%47.59%-19.57%42.26%106.92%83.32%-55.41%-33.20%
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
12.30%62.29%277.66%-15.75%57.46%-15.55%-38.09%19.10%-43.06%75.35%

Correlation

The correlation between MTSI and SEI is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2017

0.29

The correlation between MTSI and SEI shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MTSI:

$19.18B

SEI:

$3.15B

EPS

MTSI:

$2.33

SEI:

$0.97

PE Ratio

MTSI:

108.04

SEI:

52.86

PS Ratio

MTSI:

17.78

SEI:

3.54

PB Ratio

MTSI:

13.68

SEI:

3.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTSI:

$1.07B

SEI:

$692.11M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTSI:

$594.25M

SEI:

$235.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

MTSI:

$245.21M

SEI:

$249.65M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTSI vs. SEI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MTSI
MTSI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SEI
SEI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MTSI vs. SEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) and Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTSISEIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.18

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.24

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.18

4.72

+2.46

MTSI vs. SEI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the SEI Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTSI and SEI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTSI vs. SEI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTSI drawdown since its inception was -80.78%, roughly equal to the maximum SEI drawdown of -79.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTSI and SEI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTSISEIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.78%

-79.49%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.17%

-47.61%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.17%

-55.37%

+11.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.86%

-55.37%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.63%

-37.97%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.17%

-38.32%

+12.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.64%

12.78%

-1.14%

Volatility

MTSI vs. SEI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) is 20.87%, while Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) has a volatility of 30.50%. This indicates that MTSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTSISEIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.87%

30.50%

-9.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.21%

57.43%

-12.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.70%

77.63%

-20.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.02%

68.06%

-23.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.80%

62.88%

-10.08%

Dividends

MTSI vs. SEI - Dividend Comparison

MTSI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
0.93%1.04%1.67%5.65%4.23%6.41%5.16%2.89%0.83%

Financials

MTSI vs. SEI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. and Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

MTSI vs. SEI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. and Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

MTSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 164.43M and revenue of 288.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.

SEI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a gross profit of 72.72M and revenue of 196.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.

MTSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.83M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

SEI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported an operating income of 50.56M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.

MTSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 46.33M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.

SEI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a net income of 21.44M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MTSI and SEI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEI has higher volatility (30.50%) compared to MTSI (20.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTSI dropped -80.78% vs SEI's -79.49%.

MTSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTSI and SEI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer