MTSI vs. LRCX
MTSI (MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — MTSI in Semiconductors, LRCX in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 10 years, MTSI returned 26.08%/yr vs 48.23%/yr for LRCX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MTSI vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTSI achieves a 121.78% return, which is significantly higher than LRCX's 114.54% return. Over the past 10 years, MTSI has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 26.08%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 48.23% annualized return.
MTSI
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 121.78%
- 6M
- 114.19%
- 1Y
- 194.54%
- 3Y*
- 82.85%
- 5Y*
- 44.69%
- 10Y*
- 26.08%
LRCX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 28.83%
- YTD
- 114.54%
- 6M
- 128.79%
- 1Y
- 312.75%
- 3Y*
- 81.91%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 48.23%
MTSI vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 121.78% | 31.85% | 39.76% | 47.59% | -19.57% | 42.26% | 106.92% | 83.32% | -55.41% | -29.69% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 114.54% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTSI and LRCX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2012 | 0.55 |
The correlation between MTSI and LRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MTSI:
$29.30B
LRCX:
$463.20B
MTSI:
$2.33
LRCX:
$5.29
MTSI:
163.18
LRCX:
69.37
MTSI:
0.24
LRCX:
5.25
MTSI:
26.86
LRCX:
21.46
MTSI:
20.67
LRCX:
43.76
MTSI:
$1.07B
LRCX:
$21.68B
MTSI:
$594.25M
LRCX:
$10.84B
MTSI:
$245.21M
LRCX:
$6.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTSI vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
MTSI
LRCX
MTSI vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTSI | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.63 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.54 | 15.26 | -5.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.62 | 51.20 | -26.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTSI vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTSI drawdown since its inception was -80.78%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTSI and LRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTSI | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.78% | -87.90% | +7.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.74% | -20.01% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.09% | -47.10% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.86% | -56.39% | +11.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.78% | -56.39% | -24.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.28% | 0.00% | -7.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.20% | -28.17% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.64% | 5.95% | +1.69% |
Volatility
MTSI vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) is 20.31%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 21.52%. This indicates that MTSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTSI | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.31% | 21.52% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.72% | 43.63% | -2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.86% | 52.78% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.70% | 46.57% | -2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.43% | 44.92% | +7.51% |
Dividends
MTSI vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
MTSI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.28% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MTSI vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTSI vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison
MTSI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 164.43M and revenue of 288.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.
MTSI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.83M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
MTSI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 46.33M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTSI and LRCX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRCX has higher volatility (21.52%) compared to MTSI (20.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTSI dropped -80.78% vs LRCX's -87.90%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.79 vs 3.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTSI and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer