PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTRN vs. TMQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MTRN vs. TMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Materion Corporation (MTRN) and Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTRN achieves a 99.20% return, which is significantly higher than TMQ's -8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, MTRN has outperformed TMQ with an annualized return of 26.56%, while TMQ has yielded a comparatively lower 23.40% annualized return.


MTRN

1D
0.51%
1M
17.23%
YTD
99.20%
6M
93.73%
1Y
207.47%
3Y*
30.82%
5Y*
26.60%
10Y*
26.56%

TMQ

1D
2.08%
1M
-15.48%
YTD
-8.82%
6M
-15.67%
1Y
207.03%
3Y*
91.46%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
23.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTRN vs. TMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTRN
Materion Corporation
99.20%26.43%-23.67%49.41%-4.25%45.18%8.08%33.09%-6.74%23.94%
TMQ
Trilogy Metals Inc.
-8.82%271.55%169.77%-21.82%-66.67%-17.50%-23.08%50.29%58.72%114.95%

Correlation

The correlation between MTRN and TMQ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012

0.22

The correlation between MTRN and TMQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MTRN:

$5.19B

TMQ:

$675.73M

EPS

MTRN:

$3.65

TMQ:

-$0.23

PB Ratio

MTRN:

5.43

TMQ:

5.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTRN:

$1.91B

TMQ:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTRN:

$305.29M

TMQ:

$0.00

EBITDA (TTM)

MTRN:

$166.65M

TMQ:

-$7.33M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTRN vs. TMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTRN
MTRN Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

TMQ
TMQ Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
TMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTRN vs. TMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Materion Corporation (MTRN) and Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTRNTMQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.52

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.08

2.99

+7.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.56

4.36

+27.20

MTRN vs. TMQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTRN Sharpe Ratio is 4.70, which is higher than the TMQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTRN and TMQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTRN vs. TMQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTRN drawdown since its inception was -87.53%, smaller than the maximum TMQ drawdown of -96.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRN and TMQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTRNTMQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.53%

-96.55%

+9.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.73%

-69.62%

+48.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.84%

-69.62%

+21.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.84%

-86.59%

+38.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.99%

-88.01%

+26.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-62.92%

+62.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.66%

-71.92%

+32.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.62%

47.67%

-41.05%

Volatility

MTRN vs. TMQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Materion Corporation (MTRN) is 14.66%, while Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) has a volatility of 25.13%. This indicates that MTRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTRNTMQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.66%

25.13%

-10.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.70%

60.45%

-26.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.49%

235.67%

-191.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.42%

128.50%

-87.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.25%

101.11%

-60.86%

Dividends

MTRN vs. TMQ - Dividend Comparison

MTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while TMQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTRN
Materion Corporation
0.23%0.45%0.54%0.40%0.57%0.52%0.71%0.73%0.92%0.81%0.95%1.27%
TMQ
Trilogy Metals Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MTRN vs. TMQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Materion Corporation and Trilogy Metals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
549.82M
0
(MTRN) Total Revenue
(TMQ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MTRN and TMQ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMQ has higher volatility (25.13%) compared to MTRN (14.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTRN dropped -87.53% vs TMQ's -96.55%.

MTRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTRN and TMQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer