MTRN vs. ANET

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Materion Corporation (MTRN) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET).

Performance

MTRN vs. ANET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Materion Corporation (MTRN) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MTRN vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MTRN Materion Corporation	16.46%	26.43%	-23.67%	49.41%	-4.25%	45.18%	8.08%	33.09%	-6.74%	23.94%
ANET Arista Networks, Inc.	-6.30%	18.55%	87.73%	94.07%	-15.58%	97.89%	42.86%	-3.46%	-10.56%	143.44%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MTRN : $3.03B ANET : $156.64B
EPS MTRN : $3.58 ANET : $2.76
PE Ratio MTRN : 40.42 ANET : 44.57
PEG Ratio MTRN : 0.14 ANET : 1.05
PS Ratio MTRN : 1.69 ANET : 17.38
PB Ratio MTRN : 3.21 ANET : 12.66
Total Revenue (TTM) MTRN : $1.79B ANET : $9.01B
Gross Profit (TTM) MTRN : $308.63M ANET : $5.77B
EBITDA (TTM) MTRN : $183.49M ANET : $4.10B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTRN achieves a 16.46% return, which is significantly higher than ANET's -6.30% return. Over the past 10 years, MTRN has underperformed ANET with an annualized return of 19.44%, while ANET has yielded a comparatively higher 41.25% annualized return.

MTRN

• 1D: 5.26%
• 1M: -11.29%
• YTD: 16.46%
• 6M: 19.98%
• 1Y: 78.19%
• 3Y*: 8.16%
• 5Y*: 17.00%
• 10Y*: 19.44%

ANET

• 1D: 5.73%
• 1M: -8.03%
• YTD: -6.30%
• 6M: -15.74%
• 1Y: 58.47%
• 3Y*: 43.03%
• 5Y*: 44.85%
• 10Y*: 41.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MTRN vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTRN

MTRN Risk / Return Rank: 87
MTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
MTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
MTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
MTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

ANET

ANET Risk / Return Rank: 75
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTRN vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Materion Corporation (MTRN) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MTRN	ANET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.09	+0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	1.69	+0.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.21	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.59	2.03	+1.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.33	4.52	+5.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MTRN vs. ANET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTRN Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the ANET Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTRN and ANET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MTRN	ANET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	1.09	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.98	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.93	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.78	-0.68

Correlation

The correlation between MTRN and ANET is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MTRN vs. ANET - Dividend Comparison

MTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while ANET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MTRN Materion Corporation	0.39%	0.45%	0.54%	0.40%	0.57%	0.52%	0.71%	0.73%	0.92%	0.81%	0.95%	1.27%
ANET Arista Networks, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MTRN vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTRN drawdown since its inception was -87.53%, which is greater than ANET's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRN and ANET.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTRN	ANET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.53%	-52.20%	-35.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.73%	-28.33%	+7.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.84%	-50.42%	+2.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.99%	-52.20%	-9.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.17%	-24.22%	+11.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.85%	-15.48%	-24.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.20%	12.74%	-5.54%

Volatility

MTRN vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Materion Corporation (MTRN) is 16.40%, while Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a volatility of 18.76%. This indicates that MTRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTRN	ANET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.40%	18.76%	-2.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.92%	36.68%	-3.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.56%	53.89%	-10.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.60%	45.96%	-5.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.03%	44.41%	-4.38%

Financials

MTRN vs. ANET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Materion Corporation and Arista Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MTRN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Materion Corporation reported a gross profit of 70.04M and revenue of 496.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.

ANET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.56B and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.9%.

MTRN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Materion Corporation reported an operating income of 10.84M and revenue of 496.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

ANET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.03B and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.5%.

MTRN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Materion Corporation reported a net income of 6.57M and revenue of 496.13M, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.

ANET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 955.80M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.