MTRA vs. RODM

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

MTRA (Invesco International Growth Focus ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, MTRA returned 7.27% vs 23.98% for RODM. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MTRA charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.

Performance

MTRA vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTRA achieves a 2.54% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 12.53% return.

MTRA

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 1.79%
• 6M: -1.42%
• YTD: 2.54%
• 1Y: 7.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RODM

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 10.66%
• YTD: 12.53%
• 1Y: 23.98%
• 3Y*: 20.41%
• 5Y*: 10.01%
• 10Y*: 9.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTRA vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MTRA Invesco International Growth Focus ETF	2.54%	4.16%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	12.53%	12.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MTRA and RODM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025	0.69

The correlation between MTRA and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MTRA vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTRA

MTRA Risk / Return Rank: 14
MTRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
MTRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
MTRA Omega Ratio Rank: 14
MTRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
MTRA Martin Ratio Rank: 16

RODM

RODM Risk / Return Rank: 82
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTRA vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MTRA	RODM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	2.12	-1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.56	3.01	-2.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.39	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	3.27	-2.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.10	12.81	-11.72

MTRA vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTRA Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTRA and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MTRA vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTRA drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, smaller than the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRA and RODM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTRA	RODM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.77%	-35.98%	+20.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.77%	-7.10%	-8.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.00%	-0.05%	-2.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-6.33%	+2.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.27%	1.81%	+3.46%

Volatility

MTRA vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.03%. This indicates that MTRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTRA	RODM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.47%	3.03%	+4.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.37%	8.87%	+7.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.72%	10.96%	+7.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.43%	13.44%	+4.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.43%	14.96%	+3.47%

MTRA vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTRA has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTRA vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

MTRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than RODM's 2.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MTRA Invesco International Growth Focus ETF	0.67%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	2.83%	3.11%	4.09%	4.42%	3.81%	4.41%	2.82%	2.82%	2.03%	2.24%	3.19%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTRA and RODM in my portfolio?

MTRA and RODM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MTRA or RODM?

MTRA has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to RODM (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTRA dropped -15.77% vs RODM's -35.98%.

Which ETF is better, MTRA or RODM?

On 1-year performance, RODM leads with 23.98% vs 7.27% for MTRA. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MTRA or RODM?

Over the 1-year period, RODM has performed better with a 23.98% return vs 7.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTRA or RODM?

RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for MTRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTRA or RODM?

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.67% for MTRA.

What is the main difference between MTRA and RODM?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for MTRA and 0.29% for RODM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.