MTRA vs. PATN

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

MTRA (Invesco International Growth Focus ETF) and PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, MTRA returned 7.27% vs 58.61% for PATN. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MTRA charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PATN.

Performance

MTRA vs. PATN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTRA achieves a 2.54% return, which is significantly lower than PATN's 34.37% return.

MTRA

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 1.79%
• 6M: -1.42%
• YTD: 2.54%
• 1Y: 7.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PATN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.49%
• 6M: 27.41%
• YTD: 34.37%
• 1Y: 58.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTRA vs. PATN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MTRA Invesco International Growth Focus ETF	2.54%	4.16%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	34.37%	20.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MTRA and PATN is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025	0.87

The correlation between MTRA and PATN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MTRA vs. PATN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTRA

MTRA Risk / Return Rank: 14
MTRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
MTRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
MTRA Omega Ratio Rank: 14
MTRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
MTRA Martin Ratio Rank: 16

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 87
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTRA vs. PATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MTRA	PATN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	2.38	-2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.56	2.98	-2.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.43	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	4.02	-3.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.10	15.01	-13.91

MTRA vs. PATN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTRA Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the PATN Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTRA and PATN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MTRA vs. PATN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTRA drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, smaller than the maximum PATN drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRA and PATN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTRA	PATN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.77%	-16.77%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.77%	-14.40%	-1.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.00%	-5.38%	+2.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-3.21%	-0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.27%	3.85%	+1.42%

Volatility

MTRA vs. PATN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) is 7.47%, while Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that MTRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PATN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTRA	PATN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.47%	10.84%	-3.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.37%	21.92%	-5.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.72%	24.37%	-5.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.43%	22.37%	-3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.43%	22.37%	-3.94%

MTRA vs. PATN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTRA has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than PATN's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTRA vs. PATN - Dividend Comparison

MTRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than PATN's 1.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MTRA Invesco International Growth Focus ETF	0.67%	0.69%	0.00%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.62%	2.25%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTRA and PATN in my portfolio?

MTRA and PATN have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MTRA or PATN?

PATN has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to MTRA (7.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTRA dropped -15.77% vs PATN's -16.77%.

Which ETF is better, MTRA or PATN?

On 1-year performance, PATN leads with 58.61% vs 7.27% for MTRA. On fees, MTRA is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, MTRA has been the lower-risk option at 7.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MTRA or PATN?

Over the 1-year period, PATN has performed better with a 58.61% return vs 7.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTRA or PATN?

MTRA is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTRA or PATN?

PATN has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.67% for MTRA.

What is the main difference between MTRA and PATN?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for MTRA and 0.65% for PATN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.