MTDR vs. SBLK
MTDR (Matador Resources Company) and SBLK (Star Bulk Carriers Corp.) are both stocks. MTDR operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while SBLK operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, MTDR returned 10.83%/yr vs 29.20%/yr for SBLK. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MTDR vs. SBLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTDR achieves a 19.25% return, which is significantly lower than SBLK's 54.81% return. Over the past 10 years, MTDR has underperformed SBLK with an annualized return of 10.83%, while SBLK has yielded a comparatively higher 29.20% annualized return.
MTDR
- 1D
- 3.27%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- YTD
- 19.25%
- 1Y
- 3.12%
- 3Y*
- -1.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.10%
SBLK
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 15.88%
- 6M
- 29.65%
- YTD
- 54.81%
- 1Y
- 64.26%
- 3Y*
- 25.32%
- 5Y*
- 21.92%
- 10Y*
- 29.20%
- ALL TIME*
- -9.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $116.12M | $98.02M | $97.95M | |
| $36.73M | $32.98M | $35.30M |
MTDR vs. SBLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTDR Matador Resources Company | 19.25% | -22.31% | 0.37% | 0.57% | 55.83% | 207.33% | -32.89% | 15.71% | -50.11% | 20.85% |
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 54.81% | 30.76% | -21.04% | 19.24% | 8.50% | 185.15% | -24.77% | 29.82% | -18.83% | 120.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTDR and SBLK is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.25 |
The correlation between MTDR and SBLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MTDR:
$6.20B
SBLK:
$3.21B
MTDR:
$3.89
SBLK:
$1.25
MTDR:
12.82
SBLK:
22.91
MTDR:
1.84
SBLK:
2.98
MTDR:
1.10
SBLK:
1.32
MTDR:
$3.36B
SBLK:
$1.09B
MTDR:
$3.43B
SBLK:
$377.07M
MTDR:
$1.97B
SBLK:
$377.39M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTDR vs. SBLK — Risk / Return Rank
MTDR
SBLK
MTDR vs. SBLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matador Resources Company (MTDR) and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTDR | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.32 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | 3.69 | -3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.22 | 9.75 | -9.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTDR vs. SBLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTDR drawdown since its inception was -96.50%, roughly equal to the maximum SBLK drawdown of -99.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTDR and SBLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTDR | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.50% | -99.76% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.06% | -17.49% | -11.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.83% | -48.44% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.29% | -48.44% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.50% | -73.77% | -22.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.94% | -93.01% | +66.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.07% | -82.76% | +57.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.24% | 6.61% | +7.63% |
Volatility
MTDR vs. SBLK - Volatility Comparison
Matador Resources Company (MTDR) has a higher volatility of 14.32% compared to Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) at 12.52%. This indicates that MTDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTDR | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.32% | 12.52% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.69% | 24.80% | +6.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.65% | 31.63% | +10.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.85% | 42.59% | +4.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.89% | 51.77% | +13.12% |
Dividends
MTDR vs. SBLK - Dividend Comparison
MTDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than SBLK's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTDR Matador Resources Company | 2.88% | 3.09% | 1.51% | 1.14% | 0.52% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 3.58% | 1.56% | 16.72% | 7.38% | 33.80% | 9.93% | 0.57% | 0.42% |
Financials
MTDR vs. SBLK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Matador Resources Company and Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTDR vs. SBLK - Profitability Comparison
MTDR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Matador Resources Company reported a gross profit of 564.11M and revenue of 671.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.0%.
SBLK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a gross profit of 92.95M and revenue of 281.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.
MTDR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Matador Resources Company reported an operating income of 46.82M and revenue of 671.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
SBLK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported an operating income of 73.02M and revenue of 281.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.0%.
MTDR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Matador Resources Company reported a net income of -35.87M and revenue of 671.64M, resulting in a net margin of -5.3%.
SBLK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a net income of 58.53M and revenue of 281.15M, resulting in a net margin of 20.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTDR and SBLK have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTDR has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to SBLK (12.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTDR dropped -96.50% vs SBLK's -99.76%.
SBLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTDR and SBLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer