PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTBA vs. TFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MTBA vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MTBA vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
-0.43%7.74%1.99%3.64%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
0.92%4.22%5.34%0.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTBA achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than TFLO's 0.92% return.


MTBA

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
1.22%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TFLO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.92%
6M
1.98%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
4.84%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
2.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MTBA vs. TFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MTBA and TFLO have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

MTBA vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTBA
MTBA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
MTBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTBA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MTBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTBA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

TFLO
TFLO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTBA vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTBATFLODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

13.83

-12.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

45.28

-43.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

11.01

-9.74

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

207.06

-205.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.36

735.43

-728.07

MTBA vs. TFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTBA Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the TFLO Sharpe Ratio of 13.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTBA and TFLO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTBATFLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

13.83

-12.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

9.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

4.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

0.96

+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between MTBA and TFLO is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MTBA vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison

MTBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than TFLO's 4.05% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
6.08%5.98%6.03%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.05%4.16%5.21%4.88%1.68%0.00%0.36%2.08%1.65%0.86%0.31%0.15%

Drawdowns

MTBA vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTBA drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, smaller than the maximum TFLO drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTBA and TFLO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MTBATFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-5.01%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

-0.02%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

0.00%

-1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-0.10%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.01%

+0.65%

Volatility

MTBA vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison

Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) has a higher volatility of 1.65% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.07%. This indicates that MTBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MTBATFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

0.07%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.09%

0.21%

+1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

0.30%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.97%

0.36%

+3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.97%

0.50%

+3.47%