TFLO vs. BIL

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TFLO having a 1.51% return and BIL slightly lower at 1.48%. Over the past 10 years, TFLO has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 2.04%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 1.77% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TFLO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TFLO Sharpe Ratio is 15.07, which is comparable to the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 20.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFLO and BIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, which matches BIL's 4.69% yield.

The maximum TFLO drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFLO and BIL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) has a higher volatility of 0.11% compared to SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that TFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.