MTBA vs. PINK

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

MTBA (Simplify MBS ETF) and PINK (Simplify Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Simplify, while PINK is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MTBA returned 4.90% vs 26.02% for PINK. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MTBA charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PINK.

Performance

MTBA vs. PINK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTBA achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than PINK's 1.52% return.

MTBA

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: 0.02%
• 6M: 0.67%
• 1Y: 4.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PINK

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: 0.42%
• 1Y: 26.02%
• 3Y*: 13.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTBA vs. PINK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF	0.02%	7.74%	1.99%	3.67%
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF	1.52%	24.34%	8.81%	11.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MTBA and PINK is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023	0.27

Return for Risk

MTBA vs. PINK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTBA

MTBA Risk / Return Rank: 47
MTBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
MTBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
MTBA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
MTBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
MTBA Martin Ratio Rank: 39

PINK

PINK Risk / Return Rank: 40
PINK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
PINK Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
PINK Omega Ratio Rank: 41
PINK Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
PINK Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTBA vs. PINK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MTBA	PINK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.39	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.06	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.24	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	1.53	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.41	4.58	+0.83

MTBA vs. PINK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTBA Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the PINK Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTBA and PINK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MTBA vs. PINK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTBA drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, smaller than the maximum PINK drawdown of -18.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTBA and PINK.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTBA	PINK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-18.77%	+15.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.82%	-16.81%	+13.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-3.67%	+2.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.80%	-6.72%	+5.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.87%	5.60%	-4.73%

Volatility

MTBA vs. PINK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) is 1.28%, while Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that MTBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PINK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTBA	PINK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	5.68%	-4.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.54%	13.84%	-11.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.08%	18.51%	-15.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.95%	17.61%	-13.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.95%	17.61%	-13.66%

MTBA vs. PINK - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTBA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PINK's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTBA vs. PINK - Dividend Comparison

MTBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than PINK's 0.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF	6.07%	5.98%	6.03%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF	0.67%	0.68%	0.32%	0.94%	0.42%	0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTBA and PINK in my portfolio?

MTBA and PINK have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MTBA or PINK?

PINK has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to MTBA (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTBA dropped -3.48% vs PINK's -18.77%.

Which ETF is better, MTBA or PINK?

On 1-year performance, PINK leads with 26.02% vs 4.90% for MTBA. On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTBA has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MTBA or PINK?

Over the 1-year period, PINK has performed better with a 26.02% return vs 4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTBA or PINK?

MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PINK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTBA or PINK?

MTBA has the higher dividend yield at 6.07%, compared with 0.67% for PINK.

What is the main difference between MTBA and PINK?

MTBA is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while PINK is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTBA and 0.50% for PINK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MTBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.