PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRONX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IRONX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRONX achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 11.16% return. Over the past 10 years, IRONX has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 26.85%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.75% annualized return.


IRONX

1D
0.07%
1M
2.45%
YTD
5.49%
6M
5.17%
1Y
15.41%
3Y*
12.31%
5Y*
9.68%
10Y*
26.85%

^GSPC

1D
0.13%
1M
5.25%
YTD
11.16%
6M
11.43%
1Y
28.20%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*
13.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRONX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRONX
Ironclad Managed Risk Fund
5.49%10.57%14.78%10.61%0.26%13.24%5.91%458.33%1.99%3.33%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
11.16%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IRONX and ^GSPC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2010

0.86

The correlation between IRONX and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.98 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRONX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRONX
IRONX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IRONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRONX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IRONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRONX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRONX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRONX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

2.39

-0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.70

3.25

-0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

3.16

-0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.82

14.61

-4.79

IRONX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRONX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRONX and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRONX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.39

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.75

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.76

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.47

+0.10

Drawdowns

IRONX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRONX drawdown since its inception was -13.71%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRONX and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRONX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.71%

-56.78%

+43.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.99%

-9.10%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.68%

-18.90%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.68%

-25.43%

+13.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.71%

-33.92%

+20.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.78%

-10.72%

+8.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.97%

-0.37%

Volatility

IRONX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) is 1.83%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that IRONX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRONX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

2.84%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.98%

8.98%

-3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.15%

11.87%

-3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.45%

16.90%

-7.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.76%

18.07%

+22.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, IRONX and ^GSPC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

^GSPC has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to IRONX (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRONX dropped -13.71% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRONX and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer