MSTZ vs. TSLZ
MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTZ returned 167.49% vs -51.66% for TSLZ. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.
Performance
MSTZ vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTZ achieves a -36.91% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's 30.55% return.
MSTZ
- 1D
- -6.16%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- 6M
- -44.51%
- YTD
- -36.91%
- 1Y
- 167.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -87.10%
TSLZ
- 1D
- -3.37%
- 1M
- 29.62%
- 6M
- 18.97%
- YTD
- 30.55%
- 1Y
- -51.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -72.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $97.62M | $122.56M | $177.90M | |
| $38.09M | $32.22M | $41.20M |
MSTZ vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -36.91% | -38.95% | -94.43% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 30.55% | -75.98% | -81.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTZ and TSLZ is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTZ vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
MSTZ
TSLZ
MSTZ vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTZ | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.95 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | -0.76 | +2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | -0.93 | +4.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTZ vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.38%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTZ and TSLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTZ | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.38% | -99.11% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.89% | -68.61% | -16.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.85% | -98.63% | +0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.64% | -76.66% | -17.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.88% | 55.35% | -9.47% |
Volatility
MSTZ vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) have volatilities of 34.21% and 32.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTZ | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.21% | 32.71% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 133.75% | 67.42% | +66.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 149.38% | 91.78% | +57.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 169.58% | 117.59% | +51.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 169.58% | 117.59% | +51.99% |
MSTZ vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSTZ and TSLZ have an expense ratio of 1.05%.
Dividends
MSTZ vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.53% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTZ and TSLZ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (34.21%) compared to TSLZ (32.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTZ dropped -99.38% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 167.49% vs -51.66% for TSLZ. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLZ has been the lower-risk option at 32.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 167.49% return vs -51.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTZ and TSLZ have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.
TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
They also come from different issuers: REX and T-Rex.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTZ and TSLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer