MSTZ vs. DRNZ
MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) and DRNZ (REX Drone ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX, while DRNZ is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the VettaFi Drone Index. MSTZ is actively managed, while DRNZ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.50, they often move in opposite directions. MSTZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRNZ.
Performance
MSTZ vs. DRNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTZ achieves a -46.88% return, which is significantly lower than DRNZ's 24.77% return.
MSTZ
- 1D
- 14.02%
- 1M
- 86.49%
- YTD
- -46.88%
- 6M
- -23.06%
- 1Y
- 94.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRNZ
- 1D
- -6.81%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 24.77%
- 6M
- 32.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ vs. DRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -46.88% | 160.44% |
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 24.77% | -10.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTZ and DRNZ is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | -0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTZ vs. DRNZ — Risk / Return Rank
MSTZ
DRNZ
MSTZ vs. DRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and REX Drone ETF (DRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTZ | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTZ | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | 0.39 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
MSTZ vs. DRNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than DRNZ's maximum drawdown of -24.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTZ and DRNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTZ | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.36% | -24.52% | -74.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.14% | -7.44% | -90.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.39% | -11.12% | -83.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.30% | — | — |
Volatility
MSTZ vs. DRNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTZ | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 125.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.34% | 50.82% | +89.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.37% | 50.82% | +119.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.37% | 50.82% | +119.55% |
MSTZ vs. DRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than DRNZ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTZ vs. DRNZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSTZ nor DRNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTZ and DRNZ have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRNZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRNZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
MSTZ and DRNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
MSTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DRNZ is Aerospace & Defense. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTZ and 0.65% for DRNZ.
Find the right allocation for MSTZ and DRNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer