PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTZ vs. DRNZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTZ vs. DRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and REX Drone ETF (DRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTZ achieves a -46.88% return, which is significantly lower than DRNZ's 24.77% return.


MSTZ

1D
14.02%
1M
86.49%
YTD
-46.88%
6M
-23.06%
1Y
94.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRNZ

1D
-6.81%
1M
4.78%
YTD
24.77%
6M
32.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTZ vs. DRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-46.88%160.44%
DRNZ
REX Drone ETF
24.77%-10.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTZ and DRNZ is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025

-0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTZ vs. DRNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DRNZ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTZ vs. DRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and REX Drone ETF (DRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTZDRNZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.35

MSTZ vs. DRNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTZDRNZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.53

0.39

-0.92

Drawdowns

MSTZ vs. DRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than DRNZ's maximum drawdown of -24.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTZ and DRNZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTZDRNZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.36%

-24.52%

-74.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.14%

-7.44%

-90.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.39%

-11.12%

-83.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.30%

Volatility

MSTZ vs. DRNZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTZDRNZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

125.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

140.34%

50.82%

+89.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

170.37%

50.82%

+119.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

170.37%

50.82%

+119.55%

MSTZ vs. DRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than DRNZ's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTZ vs. DRNZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSTZ nor DRNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTZ and DRNZ have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRNZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRNZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

MSTZ and DRNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

MSTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DRNZ is Aerospace & Defense. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTZ and 0.65% for DRNZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTZ and DRNZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer