PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTZ vs. AGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTZ vs. AGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and KraneShares Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTZ achieves a -36.91% return, which is significantly lower than AGIX's 24.78% return.


MSTZ

1D
-6.16%
1M
-2.61%
6M
-44.51%
YTD
-36.91%
1Y
167.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-87.10%

AGIX

1D
3.85%
1M
1.99%
6M
31.88%
YTD
24.78%
1Y
43.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
34.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.60M$6.90M$18.06M
$97.62M$122.56M$177.90M

MSTZ vs. AGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-36.91%-38.95%-94.43%
AGIX
KraneShares Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
24.78%29.24%16.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTZ and AGIX is -0.55, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024

-0.50

The correlation between MSTZ and AGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.55 to -0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTZ vs. AGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

AGIX
AGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
AGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSTZ vs. AGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and KraneShares Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTZAGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

2.18

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.67

5.43

-1.76

MSTZ vs. AGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the AGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTZ and AGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSTZ vs. AGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.38%, which is greater than AGIX's maximum drawdown of -31.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTZ and AGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTZAGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.38%

-31.48%

-67.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.89%

-19.85%

-65.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.85%

-8.30%

-89.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.64%

-6.18%

-88.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.88%

7.97%

+37.91%

Volatility

MSTZ vs. AGIX - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a higher volatility of 34.21% compared to KraneShares Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AGIX) at 10.56%. This indicates that MSTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTZAGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.21%

10.56%

+23.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

133.75%

24.38%

+109.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

149.38%

29.00%

+120.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

169.58%

30.24%

+139.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

169.58%

30.24%

+139.34%

MSTZ vs. AGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than AGIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTZ vs. AGIX - Dividend Comparison

MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSTZ and AGIX have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (34.21%) compared to AGIX (10.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTZ dropped -99.38% vs AGIX's -31.48%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 167.49% vs 43.17% for AGIX. On fees, AGIX is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, AGIX has been the lower-risk option at 10.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 167.49% return vs 43.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGIX is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

AGIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

MSTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AGIX is Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: REX and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTZ and 1.00% for AGIX.

AGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTZ and AGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer