AGIX vs. BOTZ
AGIX (KraneShares Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGIX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Etna Artificial General Intelligence Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AGIX returned 65.78% vs 29.53% for BOTZ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AGIX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
AGIX vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGIX achieves a 33.40% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 11.15% return.
AGIX
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 18.09%
- YTD
- 33.40%
- 6M
- 34.78%
- 1Y
- 65.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 29.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.97%
- 5Y*
- 3.18%
- 10Y*
- —
AGIX vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AGIX KraneShares Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 33.40% | 29.24% | 15.47% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 11.15% | 14.17% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGIX and BOTZ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024 | 0.78 |
The correlation between AGIX and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
AGIX vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AGIX
BOTZ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
AGIX
BOTZ
Communication Services
AGIX
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
AGIX
BOTZ
Financial Services
AGIX
BOTZ
Industrials
AGIX
BOTZ
Utilities
AGIX
BOTZ
Healthcare
AGIX
BOTZ
Basic Materials
AGIX
-
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
AGIX
-
BOTZ
Energy
AGIX
-
BOTZ
Real Estate
AGIX
-
BOTZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGIX vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
AGIX
BOTZ
AGIX vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AGIX) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGIX | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.63 | 1.24 | +1.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.27 | 1.87 | +1.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.22 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 1.53 | +1.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.79 | 5.26 | +4.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGIX | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 1.24 | +1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.44 | +1.09 |
Drawdowns
AGIX vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGIX drawdown since its inception was -31.48%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGIX and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGIX | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.48% | -55.54% | +24.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.85% | -19.34% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -3.27% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -18.32% | +12.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.74% | 5.63% | +1.11% |
Volatility
AGIX vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AGIX) has a higher volatility of 8.30% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 7.77%. This indicates that AGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGIX | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.30% | 7.77% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.85% | 18.40% | +1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.11% | 23.98% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.24% | 26.73% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.24% | 25.73% | +3.51% |
AGIX vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGIX vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
AGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGIX KraneShares Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.90% | 1.21% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.59% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGIX and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGIX has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to BOTZ (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGIX dropped -31.48% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 1-year performance, AGIX leads with 65.78% vs 29.53% for BOTZ. On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AGIX has performed better with a 65.78% return vs 29.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for AGIX.
AGIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.59% for BOTZ.
AGIX is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. AGIX tracks Solactive Etna Artificial General Intelligence Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Kraneshares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for AGIX and 0.68% for BOTZ.
AGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGIX and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer