PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTP vs. NVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTP vs. NVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTP achieves a -52.13% return, which is significantly lower than NVD's -34.83% return.


MSTP

1D
-13.74%
1M
-54.90%
YTD
-52.13%
6M
-70.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVD

1D
7.13%
1M
-18.10%
YTD
-34.83%
6M
-40.44%
1Y
-67.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTP vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSTP
GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF
-52.13%-88.99%
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
-34.83%-47.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTP and NVD is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

-0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTP vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTP

NVD
NVD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTP vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSTP vs. NVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTPNVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.67

-0.87

+0.20

Drawdowns

MSTP vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTP drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, roughly equal to the maximum NVD drawdown of -99.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTP and NVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTPNVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.25%

-99.26%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.92%

-99.12%

+3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.56%

-81.65%

+13.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.63%

Volatility

MSTP vs. NVD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTPNVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

141.47%

68.60%

+72.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

141.47%

92.60%

+48.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

141.47%

92.60%

+48.87%

MSTP vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSTP and NVD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

MSTP vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison

MSTP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.15%.


PositionTTM202520242023
MSTP
GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
18.15%11.83%8.68%15.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTP and NVD have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSTP and NVD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

NVD has the higher dividend yield at 18.15%, compared with 0.00% for MSTP.

MSTP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVD is Inverse Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTP and NVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer