MSTP vs. BAMU

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MSTP (GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTP returned -96.89% vs 2.83% for BAMU. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MSTP charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

MSTP vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTP achieves a -76.87% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.52% return.

MSTP

• 1D: 2.80%
• 1M: -14.92%
• 6M: -71.19%
• YTD: -76.87%
• 1Y: -96.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -95.95%

BAMU

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.24%
• 6M: 1.24%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 1Y: 2.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	$205.15K	$225.66K	$217.36K
MSTP GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF	$732.01K	$891.77K	$1.11M

MSTP vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSTP GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF	-76.87%	-89.07%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.52%	1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTP and BAMU is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

MSTP vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSTP

MSTP Risk / Return Rank: 2
MSTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MSTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
MSTP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MSTP Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 99
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSTP vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSTP	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	4.89	-5.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.21	8.61	-10.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	2.40	-1.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	24.03	-25.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	95.51	-96.72

MSTP vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTP Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTP and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSTP vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTP drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTP and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTP	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.40%	-0.36%	-98.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.87%	-0.12%	-97.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.03%	0.00%	-98.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.47%	-0.02%	-72.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	79.99%	0.03%	+79.96%

Volatility

MSTP vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) has a higher volatility of 32.76% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.10%. This indicates that MSTP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSTP	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.76%	0.10%	+32.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	120.67%	0.36%	+120.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	149.50%	0.58%	+148.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	144.26%	0.85%	+143.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	144.26%	0.85%	+143.41%

MSTP vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTP vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

MSTP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.04%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
MSTP GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTP and BAMU in my portfolio?

MSTP and BAMU have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSTP or BAMU?

MSTP has higher volatility (32.76%) compared to BAMU (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTP dropped -98.40% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, MSTP or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BAMU leads with 2.83% vs -96.89% for MSTP. On fees, BAMU is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSTP or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BAMU has performed better with a 2.83% return vs -96.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTP or BAMU?

BAMU is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSTP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTP or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 0.00% for MSTP.

What is the main difference between MSTP and BAMU?

MSTP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MSTP and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.89 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.