MSTP vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MSTP (GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MSTP charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

MSTP vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTP achieves a -76.87% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 266.23% return.

MSTP

• 1D: 2.80%
• 1M: -14.92%
• 6M: -71.19%
• YTD: -76.87%
• 1Y: -96.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -95.95%

LINT

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -46.62%
• 6M: 135.02%
• YTD: 266.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.84M	$20.02M	$35.16M
MSTP GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF	$732.01K	$891.77K	$1.11M

MSTP vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSTP GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF	-76.87%	-50.36%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	266.23%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTP and LINT is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.26

Return for Risk

MSTP vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSTP

MSTP Risk / Return Rank: 2
MSTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MSTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
MSTP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MSTP Martin Ratio Rank: 3

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSTP vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSTP	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.21	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	—	—

Drawdowns

MSTP vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTP drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTP and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTP	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.40%	-69.02%	-29.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.03%	-62.23%	-35.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.47%	-24.07%	-48.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	79.99%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSTP	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.76%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	120.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	149.50%	169.02%	-19.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	144.26%	169.02%	-24.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	144.26%	169.02%	-24.76%

MSTP vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTP vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

MSTP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.

Position	TTM	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.74%	0.25%
MSTP GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTP and LINT in my portfolio?

MSTP and LINT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSTP or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTP or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSTP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTP or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for MSTP.

What is the main difference between MSTP and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MSTP and 0.97% for LINT.