PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTB vs. XCLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MSTB vs. XCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MSTB vs. XCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MSTB
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF
-4.06%18.57%18.82%16.94%-22.72%3.90%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
-5.35%10.25%20.67%15.64%-12.93%3.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTB achieves a -4.06% return, which is significantly higher than XCLR's -5.35% return.


MSTB

1D
2.06%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
-4.06%
6M
-3.31%
1Y
19.00%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
6.74%
10Y*

XCLR

1D
1.50%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
-5.35%
6M
-3.90%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MSTB vs. XCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTB has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XCLR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MSTB vs. XCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTB
MSTB Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MSTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTB Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTB Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

XCLR
XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTB vs. XCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTBXCLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

0.96

+0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

1.39

+0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.18

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.27

+1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.27

5.31

+3.96

MSTB vs. XCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTB Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the XCLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTB and XCLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTBXCLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

0.96

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.58

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between MSTB and XCLR is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MSTB vs. XCLR - Dividend Comparison

MSTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than XCLR's 13.90% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
MSTB
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF
0.43%0.41%0.95%0.16%1.34%2.20%1.78%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
13.90%13.15%18.76%1.40%1.01%1.70%0.00%

Drawdowns

MSTB vs. XCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTB drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than XCLR's maximum drawdown of -14.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTB and XCLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTBXCLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-14.63%

-11.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-8.29%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.43%

-6.91%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.38%

-4.82%

-2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.98%

+0.14%

Volatility

MSTB vs. XCLR - Volatility Comparison

LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) at 3.39%. This indicates that MSTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MSTBXCLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

3.39%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.00%

7.15%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

10.52%

+1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.00%

10.58%

+3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.94%

10.58%

+3.36%