MSTB vs. CGDV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV).

MSTB and CGDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MSTB is a passively managed fund by Little Harbor Advisors that tracks the performance of the S&P 500® Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2020. CGDV is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Feb 22, 2022.

Performance

MSTB vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MSTB vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MSTB LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF	-4.06%	18.57%	18.82%	16.94%	-13.04%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	-2.26%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-2.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTB achieves a -4.06% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's -2.26% return.

MSTB

• 1D: 2.06%
• 1M: -4.32%
• YTD: -4.06%
• 6M: -3.31%
• 1Y: 19.00%
• 3Y*: 14.50%
• 5Y*: 6.74%
• 10Y*: —

CGDV

• 1D: 2.88%
• 1M: -6.44%
• YTD: -2.26%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 20.99%
• 3Y*: 21.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTB vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTB has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.

MSTB

LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF

CGDV

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF

Return for Risk

MSTB vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTB

MSTB Risk / Return Rank: 82
MSTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
MSTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MSTB Omega Ratio Rank: 79
MSTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
MSTB Martin Ratio Rank: 83

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 78
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTB vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSTB	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.26	+0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	1.83	+0.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.28	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	2.01	+0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.27	8.64	+0.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSTB vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTB Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTB and CGDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSTB	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	1.26	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	1.04	-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between MSTB and CGDV is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MSTB vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

MSTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than CGDV's 1.34% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MSTB LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF	0.43%	0.41%	0.95%	0.16%	1.34%	2.20%	1.78%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.34%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MSTB vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTB drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTB and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTB	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.64%	-21.82%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-10.91%	+2.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.43%	-7.15%	+0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.38%	-3.72%	-3.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	2.54%	-0.42%

Volatility

MSTB vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) is 3.58%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that MSTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSTB	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	5.60%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.00%	9.27%	-1.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	16.77%	-4.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.00%	15.62%	-1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.94%	15.62%	-1.68%