MST vs. AMDW
MST (Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MST charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.
Performance
MST vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MST achieves a -46.90% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 192.40% return.
MST
- 1D
- -14.62%
- 1M
- -51.85%
- YTD
- -46.90%
- 6M
- -62.90%
- 1Y
- -92.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDW
- 1D
- 4.91%
- 1M
- 72.80%
- YTD
- 192.40%
- 6M
- 186.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MST vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MST Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF | -46.90% | -87.29% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 192.40% | 34.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between MST and AMDW is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MST vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank
MST
AMDW
MST vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MST | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MST | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.74 | 4.83 | -5.57 |
Drawdowns
MST vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MST drawdown since its inception was -94.99%, which is greater than AMDW's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MST and AMDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MST | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.99% | -34.64% | -60.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.34% | 0.00% | -94.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.22% | -14.66% | -47.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.32% | — | — |
Volatility
MST vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MST | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.73% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 101.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 126.60% | 81.56% | +45.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 123.87% | 81.56% | +42.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 123.87% | 81.56% | +42.31% |
MST vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
MST has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MST vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison
MST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 891.75%, more than AMDW's 28.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 28.98% | 34.78% |
MST Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF | 891.75% | 381.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MST and AMDW have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MST.
MST has the higher dividend yield at 891.75%, compared with 28.98% for AMDW.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for MST and 0.99% for AMDW.
Find the right allocation for MST and AMDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer