PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MST vs. MSTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MST vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MST achieves a -72.61% return, which is significantly higher than MSTU's -78.82% return.


MST

1D
-5.83%
1M
-10.00%
6M
-70.53%
YTD
-72.61%
1Y
-95.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-93.38%

MSTU

1D
-8.33%
1M
-18.14%
6M
-76.72%
YTD
-78.82%
1Y
-97.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-75.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$610.12K$656.19K$1.42M
$207.37M$183.22M$204.16M

MST vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MST and MSTU is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

0.99

The correlation between MST and MSTU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MST vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MST
MST Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MST Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MST Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MST Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MST Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTU
MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MST vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTMSTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

0.74

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

-1.00

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

-1.21

-0.03

MST vs. MSTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MST Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is comparable to the MSTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MST and MSTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MST vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MST drawdown since its inception was -97.68%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTU drawdown of -99.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MST and MSTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTMSTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.68%

-99.43%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.92%

-98.15%

+1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.08%

-99.31%

+2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.39%

-74.11%

+7.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

78.12%

80.95%

-2.83%

Volatility

MST vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST) is 30.28%, while T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) has a volatility of 36.34%. This indicates that MST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTMSTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.28%

36.34%

-6.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

108.38%

119.58%

-11.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

135.47%

148.47%

-13.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

126.83%

168.54%

-41.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

126.83%

168.54%

-41.71%

MST vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MST has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTU's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MST vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison

MST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1,038.42%, while MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, MST and MSTU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MSTU has higher volatility (36.34%) compared to MST (30.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MST dropped -97.68% vs MSTU's -99.43%.

On 1-year performance, MST leads with -95.52% vs -97.37% for MSTU. On fees, MSTU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, MST has been the lower-risk option at 30.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MST has performed better with a -95.52% return vs -97.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSTU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MST.

MST has the higher dividend yield at 1038.42%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.

MST is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSTU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for MST and 1.05% for MSTU.

MSTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MST and MSTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer