PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSOX vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSOX vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOX achieves a -34.60% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 869.59% return.


MSOX

1D
-10.94%
1M
6.55%
YTD
-34.60%
6M
-28.54%
1Y
28.79%
3Y*
-64.41%
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
10.62%
1M
28.51%
YTD
869.59%
6M
899.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOX vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSOX
Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF
-34.60%55.02%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
869.59%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOX and LINT is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.06

MSOX vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSOX
LINT

Financial Services

181.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

MSOX
181.2%
LINT

-

Basic Materials

MSOX

-

LINT

-

Communication Services

MSOX

-

LINT

-

Consumer Cyclical

MSOX

-

LINT

-

Consumer Defensive

MSOX

-

LINT

-

Energy

MSOX

-

LINT

-

Healthcare

MSOX

-

LINT

-

Industrials

MSOX

-

LINT

-

Real Estate

MSOX

-

LINT

-

Technology

MSOX

-

LINT
100.0%

Utilities

MSOX

-

LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSOX vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOX
MSOX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOX vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSOXLINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.51

MSOX vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSOX vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSOXLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.75%

-49.54%

-50.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.57%

0.00%

-99.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.89%

-20.53%

-68.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.94%

Volatility

MSOX vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSOXLINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

132.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

220.88%

168.26%

+52.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

168.12%

168.26%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

168.12%

168.26%

-0.14%

MSOX vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSOX vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

MSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSOX and LINT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSOX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSOX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for MSOX.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MSOX and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSOX and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer