MSOX vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MSOX (Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSOX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

MSOX vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MSOX

• 1D: -10.94%
• 1M: 6.55%
• YTD: -34.60%
• 6M: -28.54%
• 1Y: 28.79%
• 3Y*: -64.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EATZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOX vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF	-34.60%	-51.20%	-87.32%	-39.26%	-76.29%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOX and EATZ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2022	0.22

MSOX vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSOX	EATZ
Financial Services	181.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	2.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	78.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	16.9%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	4.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MSOX vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOX

MSOX Risk / Return Rank: 22
MSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
MSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
MSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
MSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOX vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSOX	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.51	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MSOX	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.57%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.89%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	56.94%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSOX	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	41.52%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	132.97%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	220.88%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	168.12%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	168.12%	—	—

MSOX vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSOX vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

MSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSOX and EATZ in my portfolio?

MSOX and EATZ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSOX or EATZ?

On fees, MSOX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSOX or EATZ?

MSOX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSOX or EATZ?

EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for MSOX.

What is the main difference between MSOX and EATZ?

MSOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EATZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MSOX and 1.00% for EATZ.