MSOX vs. DWAW

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MSOX (Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF) and DWAW (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while DWAW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSOX returned -64.41%/yr vs 19.97%/yr for DWAW. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSOX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for DWAW.

Performance

MSOX vs. DWAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOX achieves a -34.60% return, which is significantly lower than DWAW's 17.54% return.

MSOX

• 1D: -10.94%
• 1M: 6.55%
• YTD: -34.60%
• 6M: -28.54%
• 1Y: 28.79%
• 3Y*: -64.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DWAW

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 17.54%
• 6M: 17.21%
• 1Y: 30.17%
• 3Y*: 19.97%
• 5Y*: 8.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOX vs. DWAW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF	-34.60%	-51.20%	-87.32%	-39.26%	-76.29%
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF	17.54%	10.85%	18.48%	11.18%	-2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOX and DWAW is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2022	0.22

MSOX vs. DWAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSOX	DWAW
Financial Services	181.2%	17.5%
Basic Materials	-	4.5%
Communication Services	-	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.9%
Energy	-	4.5%
Healthcare	-	7.7%
Industrials	-	11.3%
Real Estate	-	1.4%
Technology	-	33.0%
Utilities	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

MSOX vs. DWAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOX

MSOX Risk / Return Rank: 22
MSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
MSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
MSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
MSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

DWAW

DWAW Risk / Return Rank: 56
DWAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DWAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DWAW Omega Ratio Rank: 56
DWAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
DWAW Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOX vs. DWAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSOX	DWAW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	1.84	-1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.53	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.34	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	2.62	-2.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.51	10.44	-9.93

MSOX vs. DWAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the DWAW Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSOX and DWAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSOX vs. DWAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, which is greater than DWAW's maximum drawdown of -31.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and DWAW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSOX	DWAW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.75%	-31.55%	-68.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.89%	-11.58%	-73.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.83%	-22.91%	-75.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.57%	0.00%	-99.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.89%	-10.91%	-77.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	56.94%	2.90%	+54.04%

Volatility

MSOX vs. DWAW - Volatility Comparison

Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) has a higher volatility of 41.52% compared to AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) at 6.43%. This indicates that MSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSOX	DWAW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	41.52%	6.43%	+35.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	132.97%	13.99%	+118.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	220.88%	16.52%	+204.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	168.12%	19.25%	+148.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	168.12%	24.55%	+143.57%

MSOX vs. DWAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAW's 1.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSOX vs. DWAW - Dividend Comparison

MSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DWAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF	0.65%	0.76%	0.00%	1.70%	0.53%	1.45%	0.16%
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSOX and DWAW in my portfolio?

MSOX and DWAW have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSOX or DWAW?

MSOX has higher volatility (41.52%) compared to DWAW (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOX dropped -99.75% vs DWAW's -31.55%.

Which ETF is better, MSOX or DWAW?

On 3-year performance, DWAW leads with 19.97% vs -64.41% for MSOX. On fees, MSOX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DWAW has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSOX or DWAW?

Over the 3-year period, DWAW has performed better with a 19.97% return vs -64.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSOX or DWAW?

MSOX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for DWAW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSOX or DWAW?

DWAW has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for MSOX.

What is the main difference between MSOX and DWAW?

MSOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DWAW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MSOX and 1.24% for DWAW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DWAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.