MSMR vs. VSMV
MSMR (McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF) and VSMV (VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSMR is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by McElhenny Sheffield, while VSMV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index. MSMR is actively managed, while VSMV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSMR returned 18.63%/yr vs 16.84%/yr for VSMV. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSMR charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for VSMV.
Performance
MSMR vs. VSMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSMR achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than VSMV's 9.29% return.
MSMR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 25.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VSMV
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 24.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
MSMR vs. VSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSMR McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF | 8.50% | 17.06% | 21.58% | 18.77% | -11.88% | -1.12% |
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 9.29% | 16.77% | 15.79% | 12.34% | -7.56% | 3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSMR and VSMV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2021 | 0.52 |
The correlation between MSMR and VSMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
MSMR vs. VSMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSMR
VSMV
Technology
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
MSMR
VSMV
Energy
MSMR
VSMV
Communication Services
MSMR
VSMV
Consumer Defensive
MSMR
VSMV
Consumer Cyclical
MSMR
VSMV
Healthcare
MSMR
VSMV
Financial Services
MSMR
VSMV
Industrials
MSMR
VSMV
Utilities
MSMR
VSMV
Basic Materials
MSMR
VSMV
Real Estate
MSMR
VSMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSMR vs. VSMV — Risk / Return Rank
MSMR
VSMV
MSMR vs. VSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSMR | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.49 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 4.74 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.93 | 18.09 | -5.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSMR | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.71 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.82 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
MSMR vs. VSMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSMR drawdown since its inception was -14.86%, smaller than the maximum VSMV drawdown of -31.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSMR and VSMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSMR | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.86% | -31.33% | +16.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -5.18% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.84% | -13.22% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.79% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -3.41% | -1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.36% | +0.61% |
Volatility
MSMR vs. VSMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) is 2.16%, while VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) has a volatility of 2.41%. This indicates that MSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSMR | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.16% | 2.41% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.95% | 6.34% | +2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.94% | 9.08% | +2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.24% | 12.86% | -2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.24% | 15.04% | -4.80% |
MSMR vs. VSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSMR has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSMR vs. VSMV - Dividend Comparison
MSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than VSMV's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSMR McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF | 1.80% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.31% | 1.35% | 1.36% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.36% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.42% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSMR and VSMV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VSMV has higher volatility (2.41%) compared to MSMR (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSMR dropped -14.86% vs VSMV's -31.33%.
On 3-year performance, MSMR leads with 18.63% vs 16.84% for VSMV. On fees, VSMV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MSMR has been the lower-risk option at 2.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MSMR has performed better with a 18.63% return vs 16.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSMV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MSMR.
MSMR has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.31% for VSMV.
MSMR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VSMV is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: McElhenny Sheffield and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MSMR and 0.35% for VSMV.
VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSMR and VSMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer