MSMR vs. CGGR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MSMR (McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF) and CGGR (Capital Group Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSMR is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by McElhenny Sheffield, while CGGR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSMR returned 13.54%/yr vs 21.74%/yr for CGGR. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MSMR charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for CGGR.

Performance

MSMR vs. CGGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSMR achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than CGGR's 2.98% return.

MSMR

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -2.02%
• 6M: -2.30%
• YTD: 0.25%
• 1Y: 11.31%
• 3Y*: 13.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.60%

CGGR

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -1.63%
• 6M: 2.82%
• YTD: 2.98%
• 1Y: 12.05%
• 3Y*: 21.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	$115.74M	$118.91M	$119.03M
MSMR McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF	$443.40K	$405.76K	$684.76K

MSMR vs. CGGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MSMR McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF	0.25%	17.06%	21.58%	18.77%	-4.40%
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	2.98%	19.75%	32.12%	42.18%	-14.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MSMR and CGGR is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.62

The correlation between MSMR and CGGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MSMR vs. CGGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSMR

MSMR Risk / Return Rank: 35
MSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
MSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
MSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 36

CGGR

CGGR Risk / Return Rank: 28
CGGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
CGGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
CGGR Omega Ratio Rank: 27
CGGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
CGGR Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSMR vs. CGGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSMR	CGGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	0.67	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.02	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.13	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	0.80	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.68	2.72	+0.96

MSMR vs. CGGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the CGGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSMR and CGGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSMR vs. CGGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSMR drawdown since its inception was -14.86%, smaller than the maximum CGGR drawdown of -28.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSMR and CGGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSMR	CGGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.86%	-28.90%	+14.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.43%	-15.13%	+6.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.84%	-23.37%	+14.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.65%	-4.13%	-3.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.15%	-7.57%	+2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	4.43%	-1.35%

Volatility

MSMR vs. CGGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) is 3.91%, while Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that MSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSMR	CGGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.91%	5.58%	-1.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.18%	14.75%	-5.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.78%	18.20%	-5.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.36%	21.94%	-11.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.36%	21.94%	-11.58%

MSMR vs. CGGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSMR has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than CGGR's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSMR vs. CGGR - Dividend Comparison

MSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than CGGR's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	0.15%	0.10%	0.33%	0.40%	0.33%	0.00%
MSMR McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF	1.86%	1.51%	2.26%	0.81%	0.65%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSMR and CGGR in my portfolio?

MSMR and CGGR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSMR or CGGR?

CGGR has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to MSMR (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSMR dropped -14.86% vs CGGR's -28.90%.

Which ETF is better, MSMR or CGGR?

On 3-year performance, CGGR leads with 21.74% vs 13.54% for MSMR. On fees, CGGR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, MSMR has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSMR or CGGR?

Over the 3-year period, CGGR has performed better with a 21.74% return vs 13.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSMR or CGGR?

CGGR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MSMR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSMR or CGGR?

MSMR has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.15% for CGGR.

What is the main difference between MSMR and CGGR?

MSMR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while CGGR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: McElhenny Sheffield and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MSMR and 0.39% for CGGR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.