PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSMR vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSMR vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSMR achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return.


MSMR

1D
0.78%
1M
4.23%
YTD
8.56%
6M
9.36%
1Y
25.93%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSMR vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MSMR
McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF
8.56%17.06%21.58%18.77%-11.88%-1.12%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MSMR and VOO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2021

0.64

The correlation between MSMR and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.76 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MSMR vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSMR
VOO

Technology

31.5%
35.7%

Energy

27.4%
3.5%

Communication Services

8.7%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
10.2%

Healthcare

5.9%
8.5%

Financial Services

3.5%
11.6%

Industrials

2.7%
8.3%

Utilities

2.5%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.9%

Technology

MSMR
31.5%
VOO
35.7%

Energy

MSMR
27.4%
VOO
3.5%

Communication Services

MSMR
8.7%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

MSMR
8.4%
VOO
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MSMR
8.1%
VOO
10.2%

Healthcare

MSMR
5.9%
VOO
8.5%

Financial Services

MSMR
3.5%
VOO
11.6%

Industrials

MSMR
2.7%
VOO
8.3%

Utilities

MSMR
2.5%
VOO
2.4%

Basic Materials

MSMR
1.0%
VOO
1.8%

Real Estate

MSMR
0.3%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSMR vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSMR
MSMR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSMR vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSMRVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.18

2.39

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.99

3.25

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.43

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

3.16

+0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.29

14.73

-1.43

MSMR vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSMR Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSMR and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSMRVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.39

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.89

+0.18

Drawdowns

MSMR vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSMR drawdown since its inception was -14.86%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSMR and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSMRVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.86%

-33.99%

+19.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-8.90%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.84%

-18.69%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-3.69%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.91%

+0.06%

Volatility

MSMR vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) is 2.25%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that MSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSMRVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

2.84%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.99%

8.90%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.94%

11.80%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.24%

16.81%

-6.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.24%

18.01%

-7.77%

MSMR vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSMR has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSMR vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSMR
McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF
1.80%1.51%2.26%0.81%0.65%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSMR and VOO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to MSMR (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSMR dropped -14.86% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 22.44% vs 18.65% for MSMR. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MSMR has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 22.44% return vs 18.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MSMR.

MSMR has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

MSMR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: McElhenny Sheffield and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MSMR and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSMR and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer