MSMR vs. THRV
MSMR (McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSMR charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
MSMR vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSMR achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.86% return.
MSMR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 25.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THRV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSMR vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSMR McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF | 8.50% | 3.32% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.86% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSMR and THRV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSMR vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
MSMR
THRV
MSMR vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSMR | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.93 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSMR | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 1.04 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
MSMR vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSMR drawdown since its inception was -14.86%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSMR and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSMR | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.86% | -1.50% | -13.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.51% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -0.44% | -4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | — | — |
Volatility
MSMR vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSMR | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.94% | 2.92% | +9.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.24% | 2.92% | +7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.24% | 2.92% | +7.32% |
MSMR vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSMR has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSMR vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
MSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than THRV's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSMR McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF | 1.80% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.07% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.71% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSMR and THRV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSMR is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSMR is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 1.80% for MSMR.
They also come from different issuers: McElhenny Sheffield and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MSMR and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for MSMR and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer