MSLC vs. SPXM
MSLC (Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSLC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
MSLC vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MSLC
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 6.31%
- 6M
- 5.41%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSLC vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSLC Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF | 6.31% | 8.42% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 9.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSLC and SPXM is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSLC vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank
MSLC
SPXM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSLC vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF (MSLC) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSLC | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.83 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSLC vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSLC drawdown since its inception was -17.86%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSLC and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSLC | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.86% | -5.08% | -12.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -0.75% | -2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -0.78% | -1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | — | — |
Volatility
MSLC vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSLC | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 7.89% | +4.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 7.89% | +9.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 7.89% | +9.26% |
MSLC vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSLC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSLC vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
MSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSLC Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF | 2.02% | 2.15% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSLC and SPXM have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSLC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSLC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.
MSLC has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.
They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MSLC and 0.47% for SPXM.
Find the right allocation for MSLC and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer