MSLC vs. DJUN
MSLC (Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF) and DJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. MSLC is actively managed, while DJUN is passively managed. Over the past year, MSLC returned 19.66% vs 10.33% for DJUN. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSLC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DJUN.
Performance
MSLC vs. DJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSLC achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly higher than DJUN's 3.76% return.
MSLC
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 7.18%
- 1Y
- 19.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DJUN
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 4.43%
- 1Y
- 10.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.24%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- —
MSLC vs. DJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSLC Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF | 6.71% | 15.68% | -3.29% |
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June | 3.76% | 9.38% | -1.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSLC and DJUN is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2024 | 0.90 |
The correlation between MSLC and DJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSLC vs. DJUN — Risk / Return Rank
MSLC
DJUN
MSLC vs. DJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF (MSLC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSLC | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.49 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 3.32 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.25 | 19.61 | -10.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSLC | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 2.18 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.05 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
MSLC vs. DJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSLC drawdown since its inception was -17.86%, which is greater than DJUN's maximum drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSLC and DJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSLC | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.86% | -11.96% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.31% | -3.15% | -6.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | -0.05% | -2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -1.59% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 0.53% | +1.60% |
Volatility
MSLC vs. DJUN - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF (MSLC) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) at 0.20%. This indicates that MSLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSLC | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 0.20% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | 3.54% | +5.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 4.81% | +7.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 8.51% | +8.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 8.05% | +9.07% |
MSLC vs. DJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSLC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSLC vs. DJUN - Dividend Comparison
MSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, while DJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSLC Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF | 2.01% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSLC and DJUN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSLC has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to DJUN (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSLC dropped -17.86% vs DJUN's -11.96%.
On 1-year performance, MSLC leads with 19.66% vs 10.33% for DJUN. On fees, MSLC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSLC has performed better with a 19.66% return vs 10.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSLC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJUN.
MSLC has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.00% for DJUN.
They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MSLC and 0.85% for DJUN.
DJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSLC and DJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer