MSII vs. MULL
MSII (REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSII returned -70.57% vs 3622.12% for MULL. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSII charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
MSII vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSII achieves a -28.10% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 780.13% return.
MSII
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -30.37%
- YTD
- -28.10%
- 6M
- -30.19%
- 1Y
- -70.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- -26.45%
- 1M
- 69.00%
- YTD
- 780.13%
- 6M
- 832.94%
- 1Y
- 3,622.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSII vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF | -28.10% | -61.03% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 780.13% | 495.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSII and MULL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSII vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
MSII
MULL
MSII vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSII | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -26.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.71 | -0.92 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 69.24 | -70.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 221.31 | -222.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSII vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSII drawdown since its inception was -78.73%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSII and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSII | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.73% | -72.29% | -6.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.73% | -53.09% | -25.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.65% | -26.45% | -50.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.49% | -20.52% | -26.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.34% | 16.58% | +38.76% |
Volatility
MSII vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) is 21.17%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 74.91%. This indicates that MSII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSII | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.17% | 74.91% | -53.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.72% | 119.83% | -63.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.96% | 145.72% | -73.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.62% | 142.49% | -71.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.62% | 142.49% | -71.87% |
MSII vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSII vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
MSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 97.58%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF | 97.58% | 48.93% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSII and MULL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MULL has higher volatility (74.91%) compared to MSII (21.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSII dropped -78.73% vs MULL's -72.29%.
On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 3622.12% vs -70.57% for MSII. On fees, MSII is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, MSII has been the lower-risk option at 21.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 3622.12% return vs -70.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSII is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
MSII has the higher dividend yield at 97.58%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.
They also come from different issuers: REX and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSII and 1.50% for MULL.
MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (25.24 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSII and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer