PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSI vs. CLMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSI vs. CLMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI) and Climb Global Solutions (CLMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSI achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly higher than CLMB's -7.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MSI having a 21.53% annualized return and CLMB not far behind at 20.89%.


MSI

1D
-0.86%
1M
5.94%
YTD
6.41%
6M
10.18%
1Y
-1.60%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
15.60%
10Y*
21.53%

CLMB

1D
-0.21%
1M
18.14%
YTD
-7.50%
6M
-14.10%
1Y
-9.53%
3Y*
27.04%
5Y*
29.09%
10Y*
20.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSI vs. CLMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSI
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
6.41%-16.17%49.12%23.04%-3.81%61.90%7.35%42.19%29.64%11.44%
CLMB
Climb Global Solutions
-7.50%-18.40%133.60%76.59%-8.29%88.47%22.14%70.90%-37.08%-7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MSI and CLMB is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1995

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSI:

$68.34B

CLMB:

$432.99M

EPS

MSI:

$12.42

CLMB:

$1.16

PE Ratio

MSI:

32.76

CLMB:

20.57

PEG Ratio

MSI:

2.00

CLMB:

0.87

PS Ratio

MSI:

5.77

CLMB:

0.62

PB Ratio

MSI:

26.86

CLMB:

3.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSI:

$11.87B

CLMB:

$696.85M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSI:

$5.92B

CLMB:

$108.37M

EBITDA (TTM)

MSI:

$3.35B

CLMB:

$35.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSI vs. CLMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSI
MSI Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

CLMB
CLMB Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CLMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLMB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CLMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSI vs. CLMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI) and Climb Global Solutions (CLMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSICLMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.01

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

-0.18

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.12

-0.37

+0.25

MSI vs. CLMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSI Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is higher than the CLMB Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSI and CLMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSICLMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

-0.18

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.64

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.51

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.22

+0.02

Drawdowns

MSI vs. CLMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSI drawdown since its inception was -93.60%, which is greater than CLMB's maximum drawdown of -89.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSI and CLMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSICLMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.60%

-89.12%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.45%

-53.40%

+27.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.01%

-53.40%

+26.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.23%

-53.40%

+26.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.81%

-53.40%

+20.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.10%

-33.59%

+15.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-32.23%

-8.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.09%

25.81%

-12.72%

Volatility

MSI vs. CLMB - Volatility Comparison

Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI) has a higher volatility of 14.42% compared to Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) at 10.32%. This indicates that MSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSICLMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.42%

10.32%

+4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.64%

40.72%

-21.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.77%

52.14%

-28.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.07%

45.76%

-22.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.16%

40.89%

-15.73%

Dividends

MSI vs. CLMB - Dividend Comparison

MSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than CLMB's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLMB
Climb Global Solutions
0.36%0.66%0.67%1.24%2.16%1.94%3.56%4.20%6.80%4.07%3.64%3.71%
MSI
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.13%1.17%0.87%1.16%1.26%1.07%1.55%1.46%1.85%2.14%2.05%2.09%

Financials

MSI vs. CLMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Motorola Solutions, Inc. and Climb Global Solutions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
2.71B
182.38M
(MSI) Total Revenue
(CLMB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MSI vs. CLMB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Motorola Solutions, Inc. and Climb Global Solutions over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
50.2%
14.5%
Portfolio components
MSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Motorola Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.2%.

CLMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a gross profit of 26.50M and revenue of 182.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.5%.

MSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Motorola Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 525.00M and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.3%.

CLMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported an operating income of 3.88M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.

MSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Motorola Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 368.00M and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.

CLMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a net income of 3.33M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSI and CLMB have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSI has higher volatility (14.42%) compared to CLMB (10.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSI dropped -93.60% vs CLMB's -89.12%.

MSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSI and CLMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer