PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFY vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFY vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFY achieves a -23.61% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -31.90% return.


MSFY

1D
-1.54%
1M
-1.44%
6M
-21.21%
YTD
-23.61%
1Y
-23.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTZ

1D
-11.25%
1M
29.92%
6M
-7.52%
YTD
-31.90%
1Y
266.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFY vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSFY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF
-23.61%14.11%0.11%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-31.90%-38.95%-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFY and MSTZ is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024

-0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFY vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFY
MSFY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
MSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFY vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFYMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.31

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

3.16

-3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

6.14

-7.42

MSFY vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFY Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFY and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFY vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFY drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFY and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFYMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.65%

-99.38%

+63.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.65%

-84.89%

+49.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.42%

-97.68%

+68.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.07%

-94.54%

+86.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.11%

43.66%

-25.55%

Volatility

MSFY vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) is 11.85%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 57.19%. This indicates that MSFY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFYMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.85%

57.19%

-45.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.41%

135.18%

-107.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.09%

148.74%

-119.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.12%

171.04%

-147.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.12%

171.04%

-147.92%

MSFY vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFY has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFY vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

MSFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.91%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
MSFY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF
25.91%18.56%14.35%1.94%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFY and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (57.19%) compared to MSFY (11.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFY dropped -35.65% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 266.72% vs -23.16% for MSFY. On fees, MSFY is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, MSFY has been the lower-risk option at 11.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 266.72% return vs -23.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSFY is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

MSFY has the higher dividend yield at 25.91%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

MSFY is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for MSFY and 1.05% for MSTZ.

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFY and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer