MSFY vs. MSFO
MSFY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF) and MSFO (YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while MSFO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFY returned -13.97% vs -8.12% for MSFO. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MSFY charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for MSFO.
Performance
MSFY vs. MSFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFY achieves a -10.88% return, which is significantly lower than MSFO's -3.96% return.
MSFY
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 15.01%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- -10.88%
- 1Y
- -13.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.47%
MSFO
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 15.44%
- 6M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- -3.96%
- 1Y
- -8.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $984.76K | $840.67K | $1.06M | |
| $248.37K | $216.41K | $271.72K |
MSFY vs. MSFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | -10.88% | 14.11% | 10.88% | 2.57% |
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF | -3.96% | 15.69% | 10.34% | 7.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFY and MSFO is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between MSFY and MSFO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFY vs. MSFO — Risk / Return Rank
MSFY
MSFO
MSFY vs. MSFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFY | MSFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.96 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | -0.32 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | -0.59 | -0.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFY vs. MSFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFY drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, which is greater than MSFO's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFY and MSFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFY | MSFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.65% | -29.65% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.65% | -29.65% | -6.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.66% | -12.00% | -5.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -7.46% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.11% | 16.14% | +2.97% |
Volatility
MSFY vs. MSFO - Volatility Comparison
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) have volatilities of 14.33% and 13.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFY | MSFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.33% | 13.86% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.28% | 22.95% | +4.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.55% | 27.49% | +5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.55% | 21.75% | +2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.55% | 21.75% | +2.80% |
MSFY vs. MSFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFY has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFO's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFY vs. MSFO - Dividend Comparison
MSFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.50%, less than MSFO's 36.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF | 36.39% | 33.91% | 35.15% | 6.44% |
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | 23.50% | 18.56% | 14.35% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, MSFY and MSFO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MSFY has higher volatility (14.33%) compared to MSFO (13.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFY dropped -35.65% vs MSFO's -29.65%.
On 1-year performance, MSFO leads with -8.12% vs -13.97% for MSFY. On fees, MSFY is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, MSFO has been the lower-risk option at 13.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSFO has performed better with a -8.12% return vs -13.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSFY is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for MSFO.
MSFO has the higher dividend yield at 36.39%, compared with 23.50% for MSFY.
MSFY is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSFO is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for MSFY and 1.03% for MSFO.
MSFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.35 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFY and MSFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer