PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFX vs. TSLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFX vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -28.34% return, which is significantly lower than TSLG's -20.82% return.


MSFX

1D
-6.67%
1M
5.21%
YTD
-28.34%
6M
-29.12%
1Y
-29.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLG

1D
-0.14%
1M
13.71%
YTD
-20.82%
6M
-21.35%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFX vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSFX
T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF
-28.34%9.84%-11.78%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-20.82%-26.70%-16.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFX and TSLG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024

0.36

The correlation between MSFX and TSLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFX vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFX
MSFX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFX vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFXTSLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.09

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

0.13

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

0.28

-1.20

MSFX vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFX and TSLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFXTSLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

0.08

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

-0.34

+0.18

Drawdowns

MSFX vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -60.86%, smaller than the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and TSLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFXTSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.86%

-82.86%

+22.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.86%

-54.61%

-6.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.75%

-60.00%

+14.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.24%

-58.73%

+37.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.80%

26.63%

+5.17%

Volatility

MSFX vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) is 19.56%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) has a volatility of 24.41%. This indicates that MSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFXTSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.56%

24.41%

-4.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.26%

54.58%

-9.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.40%

92.53%

-42.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.33%

115.31%

-65.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.33%

115.31%

-65.98%

MSFX vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFX vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%, less than TSLG's 8.27% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSFX and TSLG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLG has higher volatility (24.41%) compared to MSFX (19.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFX dropped -60.86% vs TSLG's -82.86%.

On 1-year performance, TSLG leads with 7.28% vs -29.20% for MSFX. On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MSFX has been the lower-risk option at 19.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLG has performed better with a 7.28% return vs -29.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSFX.

TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 7.45% for MSFX.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSFX and 0.75% for TSLG.

TSLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFX and TSLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer