MSFX vs. NBIG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSFX (T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.

Performance

MSFX vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -28.34% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 453.13% return.

MSFX

• 1D: -6.67%
• 1M: 5.21%
• YTD: -28.34%
• 6M: -29.12%
• 1Y: -29.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBIG

• 1D: -6.73%
• 1M: 83.04%
• YTD: 453.13%
• 6M: 273.38%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFX vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF	-28.34%	-21.10%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	453.13%	-62.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFX and NBIG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.21

Return for Risk

MSFX vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFX

MSFX Risk / Return Rank: 4
MSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
MSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
MSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
MSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFX vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSFX	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.58	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.56	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.48	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFX	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.17	1.21	-1.38

Drawdowns

MSFX vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -60.86%, smaller than the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and NBIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFX	NBIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.86%	-75.83%	+14.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.75%	-9.57%	-36.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.24%	-43.08%	+21.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.80%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSFX	NBIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.56%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.26%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.40%	201.21%	-150.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.33%	201.21%	-151.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.33%	201.21%	-151.88%

MSFX vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFX vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%, while NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF	7.45%	5.34%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFX and NBIG in my portfolio?

MSFX and NBIG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSFX or NBIG?

On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFX or NBIG?

NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSFX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFX or NBIG?

MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 7.45%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.

What is the main difference between MSFX and NBIG?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSFX and 0.75% for NBIG.