PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFX vs. MSTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFX vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -28.34% return, which is significantly higher than MSTU's -54.27% return.


MSFX

1D
-6.67%
1M
5.21%
YTD
-28.34%
6M
-29.12%
1Y
-29.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTU

1D
-14.03%
1M
-55.66%
YTD
-54.27%
6M
-71.83%
1Y
-95.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFX vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSFX
T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF
-28.34%9.84%-8.23%
MSTU
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF
-54.27%-89.07%197.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFX and MSTU is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFX vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFX
MSFX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTU
MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFX vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFXMSTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.78

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

-0.99

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

-1.27

+0.35

MSFX vs. MSTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is comparable to the MSTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFX and MSTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFXMSTUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

-0.69

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

-0.40

+0.23

Drawdowns

MSFX vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -60.86%, smaller than the maximum MSTU drawdown of -98.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and MSTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFXMSTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.86%

-98.58%

+37.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.86%

-96.58%

+35.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.75%

-98.52%

+52.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.24%

-71.94%

+50.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.80%

75.17%

-43.37%

Volatility

MSFX vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) is 19.56%, while T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) has a volatility of 39.06%. This indicates that MSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFXMSTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.56%

39.06%

-19.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.26%

111.87%

-66.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.40%

138.62%

-88.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.33%

169.06%

-119.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.33%

169.06%

-119.73%

MSFX vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSFX and MSTU have an expense ratio of 1.05%.


Dividends

MSFX vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison

MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%, while MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSFX and MSTU have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTU has higher volatility (39.06%) compared to MSFX (19.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFX dropped -60.86% vs MSTU's -98.58%.

On 1-year performance, MSFX leads with -29.20% vs -95.37% for MSTU. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, MSFX has been the lower-risk option at 19.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSFX has performed better with a -29.20% return vs -95.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSFX and MSTU have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.

MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 7.45%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.

MSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFX and MSTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer